Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  155 / 260 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 155 / 260 Next Page
Page Background

Police Operations and Data Analysis Report, Morgan Hill, California

17

(11,243x1.8x30.8/60). The average jurisdiction from the CPSM comparators would have used 8,605

(11,243x1.6x28.7/60) officer/hours, or 17 percent fewer personnel resources.

The reasons behind the amount of time dedicated to an average CFS are numerous and beyond

simple explanations. Officers could be using this time wisely and creating positive and valuable

interactions. Faster doesn’t always mean better. In addition, as the deployment section of the report

will illustrate, resources in the MHPD are not strained beyond capacity and officers can take the

time necessary to provide a satisfactory encounter with callers. On the other hand, this could be an

area to improve overall efficiency. For example, the MHPD assigns on average 2.3 officers to handle

a traffic accident. This is much higher than expected. At certain accidents the need for additional

officers is clear; however, assigning 2.3 officers on average seems high. The department should look

at these data carefully, determine the contributing factors behind the use of time and resources, and

make informed decisions regarding the nature, quantity, and quality of the responses to CFS.

Similarly, according to Table 8-16, response time for CFS in Morgan Hill averages 17.3 minutes per

call in the winter, and 21.4 minutes per call in the summer. This is higher than the norm for

communities of similar size and higher than the accepted target response time of fifteen minutes

per call. Response time to “high-priority” CFS, 7.6 minutes, is higher than the five-minute

benchmark for this category of CFS. A key component of these high response times is lengthy

dispatch time. According to the data analysis section of this report, dispatch times to routine CFS

exceed 9 minutes on average, and dispatch times to high-priority CFS average 2.7 minutes.

Determining the reasons behind this lengthier response time to high-priority CFS is beyond the

scope of this report; however, the department must examine this very closely with an eye toward

reducing the time it takes to dispatch and respond to CFS. This issue is also discussed in the

Communication section of this report.