54
TABLE 6-1: The Five GASB Performance Indicators
21
Category
Definition
Input Indicators
These are designed to report the amount of resources, either
financial or other (especially personnel), that have been used for
a specific service or program.
Output Indicators
These report the number of units produced or the services
provided by a service or program.
Outcome Indicators
These are designed to report the results (including quality) of the
service.
Efficiency (and cost-
effectiveness) Indicators
These are defined as indicators that measure the cost (whether in
dollars or employee hours) per unit of output or outcome.
Explanatory Information
This includes a variety of information about the environment and
other factors that might affect an organization’s performance.
As CAL FIRE evolves it is critical that a series of measurements be established to track the
performance of all operations. Currently, under the terms of the service agreement with Morgan
Hill and Santa Clara County EMS, CAL FIRE is required to meet a series of performance measures.
These involve response times, fire inspection and plans review turn-around times, dispatch
services, and engine company inspection activities. Though these measures are viable their
application to the full range of fire, EMS, fire prevention and public outreach efforts are currently
limited. To be effective, a full range of performance measures should be utilized and these
findings should be published and shared with all the affected stakeholders, including the City
Council, the Mayor’s Office, the City Manager’s Office, the District, and CAL FIRE first responders.
CAL FIRE does not provide similar performance monitoring efforts to SSCCFD officials, beyond the
required EMS response time measures. Ongoing analysis and the monitoring of trends are most
useful to justify program effectiveness, direct training efforts, and to measure service delivery
levels.
Establishing a performance management system within the framework of an overall strategic
plan would help City and District management and elected officials to gain a better
understanding of what CAL FIRE is trying to achieve. Building any successful performance
management system that measures more than outputs requires a consistent model.
Recommendation: CAL FIRE should undertake a concerted effort to expand its current
performance measures in order to incorporate a comprehensive performance
management system that monitors a full range of performance outcomes.
The process of developing these measures should utilize input from CAL FIRE members, the
community, elected officials, and city administrators.
CPSM recommends that CAL FIRE undertake a concerted effort to develop a comprehensive
listing of performance measures for both emergency and nonemergency activities. The
following are a number of suggested measures that may be considered:
21
From Harry P. Hatry et al., eds.
Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting: Its Time Has Come
(Norwalk , CT: GASB, 1990).