Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  164 / 258 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 164 / 258 Next Page
Page Background

Pacquette & Thompson:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol.

98, N

o.

6, 2015 

1709

Table 8. Collaborative study raw individual results for Se (mg/kg, as is)

a

Lab No.

Adult milk

powdered

Infant powdered

hydrolyzed milk

Adult powdered

low fat

Child powder

Infant elemental

powdered

Adult RTF high

protein

Adult RTF

high fat

1

a

0.182 0.203 0.183 0.182 0.208 0.211 0.193 0.210 0.123 0.112 0.045 0.073 0.087 0.098

2

0.236 0.215 0.227 0.244 0.304 0.291 0.214 0.205 0.210 0.220 0.109 0.107 0.135 0.143

3

0.225 0.230 0.234 0.238 0.299

b

0.245

b

0.235 0.250 0.253 0.252 0.107 0.0982

c

0.129

d

0.151

d

4

0.213 0.209 0.235 0.229 0.249 0.254 0.215 0.204 0.200 0.203 0.0893 0.0913 0.138 0.135

5

0.247 0.237 0.240 0.269

e

0.273 0.290 0.230 0.275

f

0.213

g

0.266g 0.0969 0.0989 0.129 0.137

8

0.227 0.232 0.243 0.247 0.273 0.273 0.218 0.222 0.206 0.216 0.0957 0.0919 0.134 0.134

9

0.235 0.230 0.234

h

0.230 0.282 0.254

i

0.219

j

0.244 0.225 0.224 0.100 0.106 0.135

k

0.135

10

0.204

l

0.252

l

0.237 0.231 0.245 0.256 0.195 0.215 0.216 0.199 0.0854 0.0849

m

0.122 0.125

11

0.215 0.215 0.236 0.235 0.263 0.261 0.210 0.207 0.201 0.202 0.0914 0.0913 0.136 0.136

SLV (

n

= 6)

0.225

0.245

0.272

0.220

0.214

0.0961

0.140

a

 Other rejected data are indicated by footnotes below. The value in each cell is the mean of the duplicate analyses required by the method. The paired

results are the blind duplicates tested during the study.

b

 Although rejected by Cochran’s test these data points were kept in the final statistical analysis, as the data appear extraordinarily tight; if excluded, the

RSD

R

falls to from 7.2 to 6.8%, and the HorRat from 0.37 to 0.35 for this product.

c

 Rejected, 8.4% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

d

 Although rejected by Cochran’s test these data points were kept in the final statistical analysis, as the data appear extraordinarily tight; if excluded, the

RSD

R

falls to from 5.0 to 4.1%, and the HorRat from 0.23 to 0.19 for this product.

e

 Rejected, 7.5% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

f

 Rejected, 8.8% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

g

 Although rejected by Cochran’s test these data points were kept in the final statistical analysis as a conservative measure; if excluded, the RSD

R

falls

to from 9.3 to 8.2%, and the HorRat from 0.46 to 0.41 for this product.

h

 Rejected, 15.1% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

i

 Rejected, 12.7% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

j

 Rejected, 8.4% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

k

 Rejected, 8.7% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

l

 Although rejected by Cochran’s test these data points were kept in the final statistical analysis, as the data appear extraordinarily tight; if excluded, the

RSD

R

falls to from 6.1 to 5.2%, and the HorRat from 0.31 to 0.26 for this product.

m

 Rejected, 8.3% duplicate precision, no retest result supplied.

Table 9. Collaborative study individual results for Mo (mg/kg, as is)

a

Lab No.

Adult milk

powdered

Infant powdered

hydrolyzed milk

Adult powdered

low fat

Child powder

Infant elemental

powdered

Adult RTF high

protein

Adult RTF

high fat

1

a

0.273 0.271 0.154 0.158 0.535 0.517 0.234 0.234 0.139 0.131 0.161 0.155 0.205 0.194

2

0.317

b

0.366

b

0.217

c

0.194

c

0.633 0.618 0.304

d

0.272

d

0.173 0.167 0.163 0.161 0.210 0.210

3

0.375 0.383 0.222 0.220 0.598 0.597 0.267 0.255 0.204 0.211 0.205

e

0.203

e

0.207 0.202

4

0.309 0.311 0.199 0.190 0.566 0.580 0.273 0.275 0.183 0.177 0.157 0.159 0.211 0.204

5

0.321 0.320 0.206 0.204

f

0.606 0.592 0.290 0.280 0.185 0.188 0.164 0.166 0.203 0.203

8

0.301 0.304 0.192 0.192 0.564 0.586 0.272 0.269 0.171 0.170 0.154 0.155 0.195 0.192

9

0.312 0.314 0.195 0.195 0.583 0.592 0.275 0.275 0.169 0.172 0.157 0.155 0.193 0.196

10

0.341 0.334 0.225 0.228 0.592 0.593 0.299 0.289 0.199 0.203 0.160 0.156 0.195 0.195

11

0.327 0.330 0.207 0.211 0.613 0.599 0.288 0.287 0.181 0.181 0.167 0.167 0.213 0.213

SLV (

n

= 6)

0.294

0.184

0.565

0.261

0.160

0.154

0.193

a

 Other rejected data are indicated by footnotes below. The value in each cell is the mean of the duplicate analyses required by the method. The paired

results are the blind duplicates tested during the study.

b

 Rejected by Cochran’s test; if not excluded (to maintain eight laboratories’ data) RSD

R

is unchanged at 7.9%.

c

 Although rejected by Cochran’s test these data points were kept in the final statistical analysis, as the paired data appear extraordinarily tight; if

excluded, the RSD

R

remains essentially unchanged.

d

 Although rejected by Cochran’s test these data points were kept in the final statistical analysis, as the data appear extraordinarily tight; if excluded, the

RSD

R

falls to from 4.6 to 4.3%, and the HorRat from 0.24 to 0.22 for this product.

e

 Rejected by Single Grubbs’ test; if not excluded (to maintain eight laboratories’ data) RSD

R

rises from 3.0 to 9.0%.

f

 Rejected, 6.4% duplicate precision.

164