Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 258 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 258 Next Page
Page Background

Pacquette & Thompson:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol.

98, N

o.

6, 2015 

1707

solutions at concentrations that are representative of nutritional

products in samples for ICP/MS analysis. The typical H

2

gas

mode for Se, and He gas mode for Cr and Mo, were used.

(f) 

Accuracy

.—Accuracywas demonstratedby analyzing three

NIST SRMs on 2 independent days, measuring spike recoveries

in 10 nutritional products on 3 different days, and comparing

results for 10 nutritional products obtained by this method to

results obtained by other in-house validated ICP-atomic emission

spectrometry and atomic fluorescence spectrometry methods. The

spike levels of the analytes added to the products were between

50 and 200% of the analyte concentrations in each product.

(g) 

Precision

.—Both within-day and between-day RSD

values were determined by analyzing two in-house laboratory

control samples. Within-day precision was determined by

analyzing the laboratory control samples in duplicate on each

day, and between-day precision was measured by using the mean

results of the duplicate samples analyzed on each day on 10

different days.

(h) 

Ruggedness and robustness

.—To determine the

ruggedness of the method, laboratory control samples were

analyzed by two analysts on 10 different days. Also, NIST SRM

1849 was analyzed in triplicate with varying sample weights and

with different ISs.

(i) 

Reproducibility

.—Eight laboratories completed a

multilaboratory testing protocol with this method on seven

samples submitted as blind duplicates (14 total samples analyzed

plus the SRM1849a control, which was not blinded). Represented

were four countries and five ICP/MS instrument models from

three major vendors. Results showed an average RSD

R

of 9.3%

for Cr, 5.3% for Mo, and 6.5% for Se, with an average HorRat

ratio of 0.35 across all three analytes and samples.

SLV Data

The SLV data were not published with the method above; they

will be briefly summarized here. Table 3 shows the intermediate

precision for each of the SPIFANmaterials across 8 different days

of results using two different analysts and two Agilent ICP/MS

units, a model 7500 and a model 7700. As noted previously,

the infant formulas contained no added Cr or Mo, so they were

mostly not included in the MLT. For levels above the PLOQ,

Table 4. SLV overspike recoveries (mean from 3 days, in

triplicate each day) from SPIFAN matrixes at 50–200% of

native levels

a

Product

Cr

RSD Mo RSD Se RSD

Infant powder milk

109 10.0 92.5 2.5 106 4.7

Infant powder soy

108 1.5 93.1 1.2 103 6.0

Infant powdered milk

partially hydrolyzed

90.1 1.1 95.2 5.7 99.5 2.3

Infant powdered soy

partially hydrolyzed

91.0 3.0 108 1.0 101 2.3

Adult powder low fat

101 4.8 95.4 8.1 99.3 3.3

Adult powdered milk

104 1.6 97.4 4.6 103 4.1

Child formula powdered 102 2.5 96.2 2.1 104 4.8

Infant elemental

powdered

102 8.8 96.9 2.7 106 4.6

Infant RTF milk

103 6.1 92.3 5.4 101 4.9

Adult RTF high protein 98.0 2.5 92.0 2.7 104 4.9

Adult RTF high fat

98.0 2.8 93.3 3.1 105 7.0

a

 Native levels that are below the PLOQ and other concentrations can

be found in Table 3.

Table 5. SRM 1849a results during SLV (

n

= 16, two

analysts, two Agilent instruments) and collaborative

study (run once in duplicate as a known sample by each

laboratory, together with other blinded samples)

Cr

Mo

Se

Mean SLV, µg/kg,

n

= 16

105

166

82.7

RSD SLV, %

1.4

1.1

1.8

Certified interval, µg/kg

104.0–110.4 166.7–174.7 78.3–84.1

Mean MLT (not including

SLV), µg/kg

106

167

82.6

RSD MLT, % (eight labs)

2.4

2.8

1.5

Table 3. SLV intermediate precision data for Cr, Mo, and Se (from 8 independent days of testing in duplicate, 4 days per

each analyst using two different Agilent ICP/MS units)

a

Sample type

Cr Mean

RSD

IP

Mo Mean

RSD

IP

Se Mean

RSD

IP

Infant powder milk

4.9 (<PLOQ)

7.7

17.7 (<PLOQ)

8.2

25.6 (<PLOQ)

6.5

Infant powder soy

8.1 (<PLOQ)

5.2

36.5 (<PLOQ)

4.5

24.8 (<PLOQ)

3.3

Infant powdered milk partially hydrolyzed 2.4 (<PLOQ)

20

20.4 (<PLOQ)

4.0

26.6 (<PLOQ)

2.7

Infant powdered soy partially hydrolyzed 6.0 (<PLOQ)

9.2

33.0 (<PLOQ)

3.6

26.8 (<PLOQ)

4.1

Adult powder low fat

47.6

1.3

62.7

3.0

29.7

3.2

Adult powdered milk

15.8 (<PLOQ)

5.0

32.6 (<PLOQ)

4.9

24.3 (<PLOQ)

2.8

Child formula powdered

30.2

1.3

30.0

5.1

23.7

2.9

Infant elemental powdered

23.9

6.3

17.8

7.5

23.2

2.8

Infant RTF milk

7.6 (<PLOQ)

53

16.9 (<PLOQ)

10

29.6 (<PLOQ)

2.9

Adult RTF high protein

130

2.9

154

3.2

92.6

3.0

Adult RTF high fat

141

1.8

193

2.6

133

3.6

a

 Units of concentration are µg/kg as RTF with powders reconstituted 11.1% (w/w). Note that several of the means are designated as <PLOQ and their

RSDs are correspondingly higher. PLOQ = practical limit of quantitation.

162