Previous Page  11 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

Mechanical Technology — March 2016

9

Special report

for Africa by Africans

Above:

The ZiZaBoNa regional transmission project involves a 330 kV transmission line to interconnect the

grids of Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana and Namibia. This will allow wheeling of power between the coun-

tries for better reliability.

Right:

Of the 620-million people in sub-Saharan Africa without electricity, 86%

live in rural communities. Frey suggests that large regional projects may not help these people and that

“micro-distribution networks are therefore a very good idea.”

Left:

Zambia relies on hydropower for virtually

all of its electricity generation, more than 90% of which is produced by just three major dams – Kafue

Gorge, Kariba (shown here) and Victoria Falls.

communities, Frey says that regional

integration may not be the solution for

rural people, which have to be part of

the solution. “But regional integration is

essential to get large projects moving!”

he insists, adding that one or two criti-

cal projects need to succeed to drive the

growth of regional cooperation.

Regional project cooperation however

requires a transmission infrastructure to

allow different nations to benefit from

generation investments. In East Africa,

for example, major projects have become

gridlocked, because the transmission

infrastructure is too weak to allow for

wheeling of the power across the region.

In the SADC region, the ZiZaBoNa

(Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana, Nami­

bia) regional transmission project aims

to overcome this problem. The project

involves a 330 kV Interconnector line

to link the grids of all four countries. It

was originally conceived to enable the

wheeling of power from north to south or

vice versa via the Caprivi Link – and the

revised project components now include

a direct line from Livingstone to Zambezi

together with a radial connection from

Victoria Falls to Pandamatenga.

Pressed by Frey during the forum,

Zambia’s Energy and Water Development

Minister, Dora Siliya, and Zimbabwe

Energy and Power Development Minister,

Samuel Undenge, agreed to move this

project forward as a priority. As well as

easing congestion, on the existing north-

south transmission corridor from South

Africa to Zimbabwe, the US$220-million

investment would support the transfer

of 600 MW of electricity, mostly from

existing and future hydroelectric plants

in Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe and Zambia, according to

Siliya, also remain keen on the develop-

ment of the 2 400 MW Batoka Gorge

Hydro Scheme on the Zambesi down-

stream of the Victoria falls, for which

private investment of US$5-billion is

being sought.

Nuclear parting SA’s energy mix

“Nobody in nuclear is saying that we

should only be focusing on nuclear; we

are saying that South Africa needs an

energy mix where nuclear forms part of

that mix. We are saying that South Africa

needs an optimum mix and we must not

put all our eggs into one basket,” says

Knox Msebenzi, managing director for

the Nuclear Industry Association of South

Africa (NIASA).

He says that nuclear power develop-

ment brings with it the opportunity for

South Africa to become skilled and com-

petent as a nation in certain technologi-

cal developments that aren’t found with

other forms of energy. Spinoff benefits to

having a thriving nuclear industry include

the opportunity to increase the already

successful nuclear medicines industry.

“Another benefit of nuclear is that, un-

like renewables, nuclear power is reliable

and can be dispersed no matter what the

weather conditions. It provides base-load

power to the grid, whereas renewables

are far less reliable in terms of capacity

factors. Base-load coal has the disadvan-

tage of high carbon emissions and, while

gas also provides base load power, our

domestic supplies are not yet exploited,”

Msebenzi adds

With respect to the cost of base-load

fuel, gas is the most expensive, followed

by coal. Nuclear fuel is, in fact, the least

expensive,” he says.

Msebenzi agrees that all technologies

have potential risks. Safety is therefore

paramount. “The National Nuclear

Regulator is a very active and robust

regulator. The safety of South Africa’s

nuclear power plants is governed by

legislation, which is governed by the

nuclear regulator. Safety comes first, but

we cannot let the fears of what happened

elsewhere stop us from advancing as a

nation,” he urges.

Msebenzi admits that a nuclear build

programme will be capital intensive;

which is why it is critical to get the right

funding with low interest rates. “The

financing model is critical. Government’s

Renewable Energy Independent Power

Producer’s Procurement Programme is a

world class one with excellent financing

models, and so can the nuclear build

programme be.”

“There is a school of thought that esti-

mates that 70% (by value) of the nuclear

build programme can be sourced locally.

This will reinvigorate the nuclear industry,

boost skills, create whole new industries

and, therefore, create employment.

“And the nuclear build programme

can also be viewed as a regional power

project that will see South Africa supply-

ing cheap electrical power beyond our

borders,” Msebenzi concludes.

q