Previous Page  27 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Research Matters

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org

|

27

|

the overlapping components of the theoretical framework.

Structural constraints and limited time resources, which

both fall outside of the knowledge domain for teachers,

acted as roadblocks to success and required the teacher to

use additional time and energy to overcome. School-level

administrative supports to recognize and prioritize multimodal

literacies in curricula may proactively address such barriers

alleviating responsibility of teachers to address the barriers.

Mrs. T. was

child-centered

in her actions. She introduced

and modeled each application prior to letting students use it

in groups or independently. Mrs. T. created directions for how

to use each app that included pictures and text. Most of the

pictures were screenshots of icons and screens in the app.

She purposefully had students practice using the app with

content from across the curriculums. For each project, Mrs. T.

created a project guide. The guide explicitly communicated

the students’ expectations for the project, provided a checklist,

and included instructional supports for students to organize

content. Mrs. T incorporated evidence-based practices, such

as graphic organizers, which allowed her to differentiate

supports for students with different learning needs (e.g.,

students with disabilities, English-learners). Once she created

these resources, she had them for future projects and was

able to edit and revise according to her students’ needs.

She explored the

ample use of technology

, but concluded

that it was best to purposefully use fewer apps that were

more versatile, thus allowing students to focus on learning

and communicating the content of the digital story- not

the app itself. Mrs. T. created a table that documented the

strengths and limitations of the apps that she used, allowing

her to make informed decisions when selecting which

application to use for which project. (something about

documenting and sharing with teacher and principal)

The formative design of this research allowed the researchers

to identified three major challenges, limited resources, structural

constraints, and overabundance of choice. We conclude that

appropriate resources including material items (e.g., devices

and apps) and non-material items (e.g., time, community

of learners) are basic needs for success. For example, Ms. T.

documented concern about the student/iPad rations and

this worried her. However, Ms. T. strongly believed in the

importance of multimodal literacies, so she addressed the

problematic ratio by incorporating iPad use into her centers.

While access to technology is essential to prepare students as

competent 21st century learners, mere access is not sufficient.

Teachers need knowledge, addressed in the TPACK framework,

and support, addressed through the formative design. For

teachers attempting to integrate instruction which fosters

multimodal literacy, we propose that teachers would benefit from

being a part of a multimodal learning community where they can

build knowledge and work through the obstacles together. This

recommendation supports teachers’ need for opportunities for

collaboration and reflective practices (e.g., Dewey, 1998/1933),

supporting professional developments (Connors, 2012) and

opportunities to use technology as a learning tool. School-

level administration can support teachers by prioritizing

shared time and space in a structured learning environment.

Limitations and Future Research

We recognize the limitations of case study for the purpose

of generalizability. The findings from this study; however,

contribute to scholarly discourse about how to support

implementation of multimodal storytelling in classrooms as

well as how to support teachers by building a community

of learners engaged in ongoing professional developments.

Future research may address how best to deliver professional

developments and support teachers’ learning communities.

By documenting the triumphs of multimodal storytelling

implementation, we recognized characteristics of our participant

that aided in the success of multimodal storytelling as judged

by the researchers and teacher; however, we did not document

the impact on student learning. Anecdotal evidence from the

teacher interviews suggested that the students enjoyed and

valued iPad time. Conversations with the teacher and stories she

shared indicated that students enjoyed the activities and looked

forward to using the iPad. Fostering a child’s love for learning is

fundamental to our jobs as educators and incorporating current

technology is a promising way to do that. Abundant data exits

documenting the relationship between motivation and learning

(e.g., Gambrell, Hughes, Calvert, Malloy, & Igo, 2011), therefore

we see the excitement to use the iPad as more than just a

novelty, but as a natural way to foster learning. Documenting

these relationships and student outcomes were beyond the

scope of this research. More research is needed to document

how teacher implementation of multimodal storytelling

translates to student learning and improved student outcomes.

Conclusion

The formative research followed one third-grade teacher at

an urban elementary school as she implemented multimodal

storytelling in her academically diverse classroom. This

current research shared a collective picture of how attributes

and factors coexist to promote or detract from successful

implementation of multimodal storytelling. The combination of

TPACK and formative design provided a powerful professional

development tool that allowed the teacher to expand her

technology, content, and pedagogy knowledge in a supported

learning community. This combination allowed for the successful

implementation. With the ultimate goal of student achievement,

we must first establish classrooms where teachers have drive,

resources, and supports, in efforts to build a classroom for

21st century learners. It is necessary that we foster learning

communities and professional developments that contribute

to transformative learning with technology (ISTE, 2016).