RM Winter 2017 FINAL

28 / 72

Reading Matters
Research Matters
| 28| Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |
References
(2002). No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110. Retrieved
from:
Becker, H. (2000). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other
teachers: implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools.
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(2), 274–293.
Connors, S. P. (2012). Toward a shared vocabulary for visual analysis: An analytical
toolkit for deconstructing the visual design of graphic novels. Journal of Visual
Literacy, 31, 71-92.
Dewey, J. (1998/ 1933).How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective
thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O-Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’integration
of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers & Education, 57, 1469-1483.
Ertmer, P., & Leftwich-Ottenbreit. (2010). Teacher technology change: How
knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Technology
Research in Education, 42, 255–284.
Gambrell, L. B., Hughes, E. M., Calvert, W. L., Malloy, J. A., & Igo, B. (2011). The role
of authentic tasks in elementary students’literacy.The Elementary School Journal,
112(2), 234-258.
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological
pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953-1960.
Hogarty, K. Y., Lang, T. R., & Kromrey, J. D. (2003). Another look at technology
use in classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to measure
teachers’perceptions. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 63, 139–162.
Honeyford, M.A. (2014). From Aquí and Allá : Symbolic convergence in the
multimodal literacy practices of adolescent immigrant students.Journal of Literacy
Research,46, 194-233.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). ISTE’s national
educational technology standards for students (NETS-S). Retrieved from http://
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE’s national
educational technology standards for teachers (NETS-T).Retrieved from http://
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE’s standards for
students.. Retrieved from
Jiménez, R. T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-
literacy Latina/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3),
224-243.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content
knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing knowledge and
classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Meneses, J., Fabregues, S., Rodriguez-Gomez, D., & Ion, G. (2012). Internet in
teachers’professional practice outside the classroom: Examining supportive and
management uses in primary and secondary schools. Computers & Education,
59(3), 915-924.
Magner, T. J. (2011). The time is now for 21st-century teaching. Education Week,
31(5), 24.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge:
A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2005). Position statement on
multimodal literacy. Retrieved from
multimodalliteracies
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief
State School Offices (2012). Common Core State Standards. National Governors
Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Offices:
Washington, D.C.
National Writing Project with DeVoss, N., Eidman-Aadahl, E., & Hicks, T. (2010).
Because digital writing matters. Improving student writing in online and multimedia
environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social
futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
Palak, D., &Walls, R. (2009). Teachers’beliefs and technology practices: A mixed-
methods approach.Journal of Technology Research in Education, 41, 417-441.
Prensky, M. (2005/2006). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8-13.
Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT
practices. Computers & Education, 58, 449-458.
Rance-Roney, J. (2010). Jump-starting language and schema for English-language
learners: Teacher-composed digital jumpstarts for academic reading. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53, 386-395.
Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2007).On formative and design experiments:
Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Reinking, D., & Pickle, J. M. (1993). Using a formative experiment to study how
computers affect reading and writing in classrooms. In C. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.),
Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice. Chicago: National
Reading Conference.
Reinking, D., &Watkins, J. (1998). Balancing change and understanding in literacy
research through formative experiments. National Reading Conference Yearbook,
47, 461-471.
Reinking, D., &Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of
multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students’independent reading.
Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 384-419.
Robin, B. (2008).“The Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling”Retrieved from