Previous Page  49 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Teaching Matters

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reading Matters | Volume 17 • Winter 2017 |

scira.org

|

scira.org

|

49

|

of nurturing creative young minds, and their work should

be shared with as many of their colleagues as possible.

Starting the Conversation

Although much recent attention has been focused on

summative assessments of pre-service teachers and the outcomes

of teacher preparation programs, this article represents an

attempt to spark new conversations about what’s happening

within

literacy education courses for both pre-service and in-

service teachers. All in all, I think my attempt to practice what I

preach has gotten off to a pretty good start—students report

more engagement with course activities and objectives, and

more importantly, they’re connecting theory with authentic

problems of practice. For example, many of my students have

successfully delivered their Valuing Diversity PDs in school

and district sessions; several students have reported that their

Literacy Action Plans are informing school-wide decision-

making; the Multicultural Book Blog is still being edited and

accessed months after the course ended; and in a particularly

rewarding teaching moment, one student even sent over a

link to her third grade students’multicultural literature blog.

In my quest to create assessments that are more responsive

to the social and institutional contexts in which my students

teach, I’ve also found myriad opportunities to open new

communicative channels with schools and districts. In talking

about the Literacy Action Plans with administrators and curriculum

designers at my students’ schools, for example, we’ve started a

new dialogue about the collision of policy, research, theory, and

practice. And ultimately, I think that’s a worthy goal—to engage

in the difficult work of allowing practice to inform research

and theory, just as research and theory informs practice.

References

Au, W. (2013). What’s a nice test like you doing in a place like this?: The edTPA and

corporate education“reform”.

Rethinking Schools

,

27

(4), 22-27.

Bishop, R.S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors.

Perspectives:

Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6

(3), ix-xi.

Casey, K. (2006).

Literacy coaching: The essentials

. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Cochran-Smith, M., Stern, R., Sánchez, J.G., Miller, A., Keefe, E.S., Fernández, M.B.,

Chang, W., Carney, M.C., Burton, S., & Baker, M. (2016).

Holding teacher

preparation accountable: A review of claims and evidence.

Boulder, CO: National

Education Policy Center. Retrieved from

http://nepc.colorado.edu/

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in

context.

Teaching and Teacher Education

,

16

(5), 523-545.

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What

makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of

teachers.

American Educational Research Journal

,

38

(4), 915-945.

Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in

teaching and teacher education.

American Educational Research Journal

,

45

(1),

184-205.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Teaching in dangerous times: Culturally relevant

approaches to teacher assessment.

Journal of Negro Education

,

67

(3), 255-267.

McCabe, K. (2016, March 22). Study: Evidence ‘Thin’for key accountability

efforts— except for edTPA.

EdPrep Matters

. Retrieved from

http:// edprepmatters.net/2016/03/study-evidence-thin-for-key-accountability- efforts-except-for-edtpa/

National Association of Multicultural Education. (2014, January 21).

NAME position

statement on edTPA.

Retrieved from

http://nameorg.org/2014/01/position-edtpa/

Olmstead, C. (2013). Using technology to increase parent involvement in

schools.

TechTrends

,

57

(6), 28-37.

Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns

of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers.

Language Learning &

Technology

,

7

(3), 119-140.

Pecheone, R. L., &Whittaker, A. (2016). Well-prepared teachers inspire student

learning.

Phi Delta Kappan

,

97

(7), 8-13.

Read to Succeed Act, § R313, § S516 (2014).

Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education.

Journal of Teacher Education

,

63

(5), 376-382.

Robin Jocius, Ph.D.

is an Assistant Professor of Literacy Education

in the Zucker Family School of Education at The Citadel. Her

research interests include digital and multimodal literacies,

culturally responsive pedagogies, literacy teacher education, and

critical literacy. She can be reached a

t rjocius@citadel.edu

.