Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  115 / 188 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 115 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

113

landfill in the southern U.S. However, the load was refused there, and at other ports. As

Chaz Miller wrote in 2007 for Waste 360, “The economy was hot, and news was slow.

Garbage, which is just the effluence of our affluence, was the perfect target. Greenpeace,

Phil Donahue and Johnny Carson all used the barge as fodder. Six months after it sailed,

the garbage barge’s trash was burned in a Brooklyn incinerator, and the ashes buried

back in Long Island. The media didn’t attend the funeral.”

Thus began a concerted effort to reduce the volume of trash by increasing recycling

rates of used packaging in the U.S. Efforts to establish an economically viable infrastructure

for various packaging materials and engage all stakeholders continue to this day.

While sustainable packaging is not a difficult concept to understand, it is

complex. Is it replacing a rigid container with a pouch? Is it removing a carton and

letting a toothpaste tube stand on its own on a shelf? Is it creating one bulk pack instead

of multiple single-serve items? Is it using PET instead of PVC because PET can be

easily recycled? Is it changing from a round to a square container so as to be more cube

efficient? Is it faster set-up times on the packaging line to minimise the amount of

product and packaging waste? Yes, it is all of this – and more.

Sustainable packaging is no longer focused on just recycling. Just as packaging

is not the only eco target, although it is still top of mind for many. Right or wrong,

packaging is frequently scrutinized and used as the measure of a company’s overall

sustainability, even though it may contribute only a small percentage to the total eco

impact compared to other things, such as transportation, and water and energy use.

The idea of looking at the entire life cycle of a package – from raw materials all

the way through to disposal – gained ground in the early 2000s. However, much of the

focus remains on end-of-life.

In an exclusive interview with Packaging Digest in 2013, Jim Hanna, director,

environmental impact, Starbucks Coffee Co., explains, “Consumers, especially in the

U.S. and Canada, define sustainable packaging by focusing on end-of-life. That’s caused

us to focus a lot of effort and resources into creating solutions for our packaging because

we know that’s what resonates most with our customers.”

But in seeking the broader, more encompassing definition of sustainable packaging,

most packaging professionals refer to the definition of sustainable packaging developed by

the Sustainable Packaging Coalition in 2005 – sustainable packaging [4]:

• Is beneficial, safe and healthy for individuals and communities throughout

its life cycle.

• Meets market criteria for performance and cost.

• Is sourced, manufactured, transported and recycled using renewable energy.

• Optimises the use of renewable or recycled source materials.

• Is manufactured using clean production technologies and best practices.

• Is made from materials healthy throughout the life cycle.

• Is physically designed to optimise materials and energy.

• Is effectively recovered and utilised in biological and/or industrial closed

loop cycles.

Brand owners and packaging developers continue to search for more sustainable

packaging materials. For example, efforts to develop plant-based bioplastics for