Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  53 / 188 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

51

3.2.2 Guidelines for performance measurement instruments

Further guidelines focus on the performance measurement system or, if applicable,

the instrument as a whole. This set of criteria focuses especially on the set of elements

and on the relationships between the elements within the system respectively the design

and the functioning of the instrument.

Multidimensionality

Whereas past performance measurement approaches and performance measurement

systems mainly focused on the simulation or prediction of the financial outcome of

the focal organisation by using financial measures, later contributions claimed that

this was not enough to support management. In order to do better, it was proposed

that non-financial measures should be integrated in a multidimensional performance

management system [2]. Those dimensions could be grouped into different categories.

Among the most used categories are [4], [16], [26], [48]:

• Financial vs. non-financial indicators.

• Internal vs. external oriented indicators.

• Past vs. future oriented indicators.

• Leading indicators vs. outcomes.

The idea of this claim is when managers consider different areas and dimensions of

performance and aim to keep them in balance.The result should be amore comprehensive

picture of how the business is functioning and thus make better decisions [40]. For

supply chain management, this is a very important guideline as supply chains are very

complex organisational structures. At the same time, this criterion is easy to fulfil as it is

seen today as common sense to observe the performance from different points of view.

Understandable and evidence-based cause-effect-relationships

In order to support management to better understand how the business is

functioning not only is a mix of different dimensions important. It is also necessary

to close the gap between the often financial outcome indicators and at the very basis

of management’s work the actions taken. Therefore, it is argued that cause-and-effect-

relationships which firstly are understandable and secondly are based on empirical

evidence should be modelled in the PMMS [42], [51].

But even though modern performance measurement systems such as the Balanced

Scorecard take into account also cause-and-effect-relationships between financial KPIs

and its driver-KPIs there is still a gap between the driver KPIs and the actions and

improvement measures that have to be taken (see Figure 3.6). This aspect is often

neglected by PMMS. Therefore, a crucial issue for modern performance management

systems is how effect-mechanisms could be modelled in order to induce precise

management actions based on the analysis of financial and driver KPIs.