Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 188 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

48

mentioned three elements: particular performance elements, performance instruments/

tools and performance management process (see Figure 3.5).

Figure 3.5 Guidelines for the PMMS

3.2.1 Guidelines for particular performance elements

Under the heading of guidelines for a single performance element, criteria can be

grouped which are aimed to evaluate if one specific performance element is appropriately

defined and is able to function correctly. As the single performance element forms the

basis for the PMMS, it is necessary to design each performance element adequately.

Validity, unambiguity and adequacy

This criterion is the basis for every performance element. It means that the

performance element must be able to measure the focal activity correctly and thus be

independent from external influence. Synonyms can be unambiguity or adequacy. This

criterion becomes more important the more abstract the performance element is. For

example, the quality of collaboration between supply chain partners is more abstract

than the logistics cost and thus it is more important to check the validity for the first.

A good example for a valid performance element is the total lead time to measure

the delivery flexibility or reactiveness of a supply chain. A negative example of this is

to measure the satisfaction of the workforce by the salary they get because satisfaction

of the workforce can also be influenced by other factors such as work environment or

quality of leadership.

But even for seemingly validperformance elementsmistakes in the operationalisation

of a performance element can lead to a negative validity. This applies, for example, to the

case of delivery reliability when in a just-in-time-environment an order is defined as in

time when the order arrives five days earlier or later than expected. Here the indicator

will lead to invalid results (even if measured correctly) as it does not accurately reveal

unreliable deliveries. In just-in-time-environment deliveries should be measured with an

allowed deviation of several minutes.

At the same time validity also includes that the indicator should have an adequate

level of detail [10]. In the case of the lead time, this means that several steps within

this lead time (order processing, replenishment, production and delivery) should be

recorded in order to get a better understanding of possible problems.