Background Image
Previous Page  157 / 199 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 157 / 199 Next Page
Page Background www.read-tpt.com

S

eptember

2011

155

A

rticle

Forming tubes and strategies to

minimise waste

By Phillip Aspinall, general manager, AddisonMckee

GLOBAL leader in the design, manufacture and supply of the world’s

finest tube bending and endforming technologies, AddisonMckee of

Lancashire, UK is also gaining a global reputation for forming unique

strategies to deal with the bane of the tube former’s life: ‘off-fall’ or,

more prosaically, unusable material or waste.

In a world in which budgets grow ever tighter while global steel

prices continue to soar, the issue of waste is increasingly being seen

as one of the industry’s most pressing problems and, alongside

accelerating manufacturing times, negating waste has become

one of AddisonMckee’s principal preoccupations in the design and

manufacture of its world-leading tube bending solutions.

So, while the most obvious bugbear for anyone involved in the tube

bending process will be perishables, such as wiper dies, mandrels

and lubricants, a peek into the scrap bin sitting beside the tube trim

machine in any tube forming facility will quickly establish where the

biggest problem lies, namely in bending ‘off-fall’.

Of course it is impossible to eliminate ‘off fall’ altogether. However,

there are ways and means to minimise the amount of ‘off fall’

incurred in bending and make significant cost savings in the

process. And AddisonMckee is at the very forefront of developing

cost-saving strategies to minimise material waste.

Making theoretical tube calculations

There are three main components that must be considered when

calculating the length of material needed to produce a bent part (see

Figure 1). These components are:

Clamping stock

– the extra material needed to sufficiently grip

and bend the first bend of the component.

Component(s) length

- the developed length along the centreline

of the component, including material needed for subsequent

end-forming operations and, if there are multiple components

being bent in one tube, material required for parting.

Collet stock

– the extra material needed to sufficiently grip the

tube in order to rotate and position for bending.

Examining sample figures, based upon tube centreline data of XYZ,

YBC

60.3 diameter x 1.75mm wall, 409SS

X

Y

Z CLR Y

B C

150.70 67.60 -7.45

130.40 44.50 0.00 63.50

23.97

13.78

94.10 0.00 0.00 63.50

19.61

-98.62

50.79

15.50 0.00 0.00

48.45

0.00

Determining clamping stock

When determining clamping stock, several factors must first be

considered:

Will the bender have boost capabilities?

Does the product require a square end?

Cosmetic details (grip type – saw tooth, carbide spray)

Will the extra clamping stock be removed with a saw or stab-cut

type operation?

Where a bender is equipped with boost and it is intended to use the

minimum grip length of 1D, the end of the tube will be out of square.

A good rule of thumb, therefore, is the first straight must be at least

1.5D before the end of the tube is not pulled out of square by the

bending process. If boost is not used, the first straight should be at

least 2D.

Looking at the sample data, we see that the first straight is 23.97mm.

This is a 0.40D straight (23.97/60.3). Assuming the bender used

does not have boost capabilities, we will need to add enough extra

stock to increase the first straight to 2D.

Clamping stock formula:

OD = Tube outside diameter

SLx = Straight length (where x is the first straight)

Figure 1