Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  54 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

54

overfishing been prevented since the 1950s the increase in fish

catch in 2000 would be enough to cover the annual protein

need of 90 million people.

The increase in fish catch from the 1950s was a result of new

and more effective fishing technologies that made it possible

to fish further out and gain access to deep-sea fish stock. These

fish stocks, however, are long-lived and late-maturing which

makes them particularly vulnerable to overfishing (WWF 2012).

While improved technologies, such as bottom trawling, increase

yields in the short-term they can cause long-term and permanent

declines in fish stocks. The east coast of North America and

European Union fishing waters, in particular, have been severely

over-fished in recent decades. Many fish stocks, including

the cod off the east coast of Canada have been overfished to

the extent of depletion (MA 2005). Similarly, overfishing has

severely reduced the tuna stock in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans

(Srinivasan

et al.

2010). Research has shown that fish stocks

are often highly resilient and capable of recovery even if

overexploited. However, overexploitation over a prolonged

period of time is detrimental for stocks, and recovery is highly

improbable for themajorityof theworld’sfish stock, including the

Canadian cod (Neubauer

et al.

2013). This is not only devastating

for the survival of the fish stock, but also for food security as

overfishing results in a permanent decline in fish catch.

Food loss and waste in the fishery sector

Overfishing has resulted in marine and freshwater

ecosystems losing their potential productivity. According to

Srinivasan

et al.

(2010), the total fish catch in 2004 could

have been 9.9 million tonnes higher had fish stocks not been

overexploited. From a regional perspective, the fish catch of

North America could have been 23 per cent higher, while Europe

and Africa could have had a 17 per cent higher fish catch.

Habitat destruction is another reason why fish stocks are

decreasing (Graham

et al.

2007; Paddack

et al.

2009). Coral reefs

serve as important nursery habitats for fish (Nagelkerken

et al.