Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  62 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

60

Wire & Cable ASIA – January/February 2016

www.read-wca.com

Fire Risk and Safety

Philosophy in Indoor

Cabling

By Jörg Bör

Abstract

The fire performance of cables is a very important issue,

especially in indoor cabling. On the one hand cables must

not ignite by their own in case of any perturbance. But in

most cases cables connect different rooms or devices

with each other. Thus on the other hand fire propagation

is no less important than self-ignition. Thirdly, fire ratings

are defined for safety relevant applications. IEC 60331

specifies a period of time during which the intended

performance has to be maintained while a permanent

flame is burning the cable.

Although this knowledge is common, experts often

wonder why fire performance requirements seem to

be weak in some regions. But the understanding of the

specific fire safety philosophy leads to understanding

the different approaches to achieve fire safety in different

countries.

Every risk is defined as the product of two factors: one is

the probability of an accident and the other is the extent

of damage. The risk is quantified by multiplication of these

factors. This is the same for the risk of fire.

In some countries fire safety philosophy focuses

exclusively on the avoidance of any fire. So the target

is to reduce the probability of fire close to zero. In other

regions both factors of risk are considered. Thus the

burning characteristics are much more important. If a

fire appears, negative effects on the health of persons or

technical goods shall be as low as possible. This includes

the aspects of corrosive fumes, which may transform to

acids by reaction with any water, as well as the reduction

of smoke density, which might cause bad sight in case of

fire and confuse any people looking for emergency exits.

For this reason, the criteria “halogen free” and “low

smoke” are much more important in Europe than, for

example, in America. Halogens there are used especially

for fire avoidance, because these elements have

self-extinguishing effects. The highly reactive elements

of the 7

th

principal group collect oxygen and help to stop

a fire. But compounds of halogens with oxygen are acid

radicals, which react with the omnipresent water and turn

into an acid. These corrosive smokes are a danger for

personal health and might damage technical goods as

well.

This paper discusses the different approaches of fire

safety, threats and advantages.

1 Introduction

American experts often ask why European countries

have weak fire protection regulations. On the other hand

European people wonder why Americans are not aware of

the tremendous danger of acid smoke caused by halogen

fumes. This difference is often discussed between experts

in standardisation committees as well as with customers in

cable sales presentations.

Looking at European fire safety regulations, for example

the “Constructive Products Regulation” (CPR)

[6]

, may be

confusing. Why don’t European governments protect

their inhabitants better against the risk of fire? Looking at

American fire safety regulations does not confuse less:

Why don’t American governments protect their people

against the risk of acid fumes?

In a democratic world, laws and regulations are not given

to the people, but are made by the people. Laws and

regulations are a result of the general public opinion and

mentality. In a business market it should not only ask for

standards and regulations but for the ideas behind them.

Neither customs nor any other trade barriers prevent the

sales of American products in Europe and vice versa, but

the missing acceptance of those products by the final

consumer.

2 Intercultural Differences

The first step of knowledge of intercultural understanding

is the experience that there are differences. The second

step is to recognise that these differences cannot be

evaluated to be better or worse, but just different.

The reasons for intercultural differences cannot be

investigated in this paper. Intercultural differences are

often established by historic experience or by the influence

of the geographic situation. Deeper explanations are given

in the appropriate literature.

One might think this might be an issue for typical

consumer markets (B2C) but not in markets of industrial

goods (B2B). But be aware, the managers in the B2B

market are often women or men born in that specific

region and living there, and they have to take into account

the requirements of their selling markets which are usually

in the same region. Hofstede

[1]

names this “cultural

relativity”.