106 / 154
ENTSOG TYNDP 2017 Public consultation questionnaire
PAGE 15: Towards TYNDP 2018
Q47:
Would you like to provide input to the TYNDP
2018 section?
Yes
PAGE 16: Towards TYNDP 2018
Q48:
Do you have suggestions on how ENTSOG could
improve the stakeholder engagement process?
Yes,
If so, please specify below:
A TYNDP newsletter via email
Q49:
On which topics do you consider ENTSOG would need specific stakeholder engagement?
Development of a pure hydrogen infrastructure for energy supply purposes. Some ENTSOG member companies
may oppose that for individual reason:
- Chareholder supplying natural gas, e.g. Gascade (Wintershall, Gazprom)
- Companies whose assets may be "natural gas specific" for routing or technical reasons, and may be threatened by
the setup of a parallel hydrogen infrastructure.
Q50:
This process has already started, with a public
consultation (12 May – 12 June 2016), workshops (2
June and 5 July 2016) and a Webinar (10 October
2016). Have you been involved in this process?
Q51:
As part of this process, ENTSOG intends to
provide the TYNDP 2018 demand and supply elements
as part of the joint ENTSOs Scenario Report, planned
to be released mid-2017 for public consultation. Do
you support this approach?
Q52:
For which supply source do you expect to need
the most intense stakeholder involvement?
No
Further comments:
Please integrate (regional) hydrogen supply/demand
scenarios as part of future TYNDPs, as previously
done seperately with L-gas and H-gas.
National production – unconventional,
Pipeline imports from Russia , LNG imports,
If Others : please specify below: Hydrogen supply
Q53: TYNDP uses publicly available information to
build supply potentials. Would you have specific
suggestions on publicly available information ENTSOG
could use? Which supply source(s) would that cover?
Q54: Do you have any views how to plan for the
stakeholder engagement on supply potentials based
on the TYNDP 2017 material?
Respondent skipped this
question
Respondent skipped this
question
Q55:
Would you see additional elements regarding infrastructures that could be included in TYNDP 2018?
Hydrogen infrastructure issues:
- already existing infrastructure
- potential interconnector corridors linking that infrastructure, or future supply sourceswhose locations may result
from electricity TYNDPs
- existing natural gas pipeline infrastructure or at least its routes that may be re-used for pure hydrogen, specifically
L-gas corridors which may not be needed any more in the foreseeable future.
Q56:
Would you see additional elements that could be included in the TYNDP 2018 assessment?
Hydrogen issues, see above