115 / 154
ENTSOG TYNDP 2017 Public consultation questionnaire
Q43:
ENTSOG publishes all TYNDP assessment
results in Annex E – Modelling results. Are these
results valuable to you?
Yes,
If yes, Could you indicate in which context? Do you
have any suggestion on the format of these results?
These assessment results will help to constructively
challenge project-specific cost benefit analysis.
There lacks some intermediate results such as price
chronicles used to compute indicators. These could
be useful to challenge some indicators.
Q44:
ENTSOG provides the description of the
modelling tool and modelling methodology as part of
Annex F. Is this information valuable to you?
Yes,
Would you have any suggestion on this Annex?
This section should be more explicit on the
limitations of the TYNDP, especially on prices.
Q45:
TYNDP 2017 presents the long-term perspective
on the gas infrastructure in the Energy Transition
Chapter. Do you want to provide comments? (On how
to handle this chapter in the future, please refer to the
TYNDP 2018 part of this questionnaire.)
Yes,
Please provide your comments below:
This chapter should be more quantitative. For
instance, there are no power-to-gas hypothesis in
gas demand. And these long term perspective
should be set in a coherent way with power
hypothesis. Though, in the current organisational
setup, with a fully independent ENTSOE and
ENTSOG, and competing gas an power demand
and projects, finding a consensus even on several
scenarios will be a challenge.
Q46: TYNDP 2017 includes a long-term gas quality
monitoring outlook. Do you consider it valuable that
this analysis is included in TYNDP? (On how to handle
this outlook in the future, please refer to the TYNDP
2018 part of this questionnaire.)
Respondent skipped this
question
PAGE 15: Towards TYNDP 2018
Q47:
Would you like to provide input to the TYNDP
2018 section?
Yes
PAGE 16: Towards TYNDP 2018