State of the rainforest 2014 - page 86

STATE OF THE RAINFOREST 2014 86
1. Importance of the rainforest and biodiversity
1. IPCC 2014a.
2. IPCC 2014b.
3. Angelsen et al. 2014.
4. Brandon forthcoming 2014.
5. Ellison, Futter and Bishop 2012.
6. Mulligan and Saenz 2013.
7. Hamilton 2004.
8. Mullan forthcoming 2014.
9. Koch et al. 2009; Barbier et al. 2011.
10. Locatelli 2010.
11. Mullan forthcoming 2014.
12. See, for example, Peluso 1993.
13. Nepstad et al. 2006.
14. Lawson forthcoming 2014.
15. Parker 2013.
16. Ghazoul, Jaboury and Douglas Sheil 2010.
17.http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/23/purring-monkey-
vegetarian-piranha-amazon-species
18.http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/mammals/analysis
19. Ghazoul and Sheil, 2010.
20. Hunt, C.O., Rabett, R.J., 2013).
21. Stuart L. Pimm et al. 2014.
22. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry:
International Institute for Species Exploration. Top 10 new species 2014
http://www.esf.edu/top10/04.htm
23.http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/08/olinguito/
24.http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/178371/0
25.http://www.iucn.org/?14964/IUCN-Red-List-raises-more-red-flags-for-
threatened-species
26. KEITH, D. A., et al. 2014
27. IUCN Red List (accessed august 2014)http://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.
com/summarystats/2014_2_Summary_StatsPage_Documents/2014_2_RL_
Stats_Table5.pdf
28. Mouillot D, et al. 2013
29. Butler, Rhett (2014): ‘Symbiotic relatonships in the rainforest’. http://
rainforests.mongabay.com/0203.htm; Hagen, Arild (2009) ‘Amazonas – en
hyllest til livet’ Regnskogens tilstand. Oslo: Norwegian Rainforest Foundation
30. FAO 2014
31. Foley et al 2007
32. TEEB 2010
33. Ibid
34. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005
35. FAO 2011c
36. Ghazoul and Sheil 2010
37. FAO 2011
38. CBD 2009
39. TEEB 2010
40.http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/TEEBcase-
Biodiversity-and-Health.pdf
41. CBD 2009
42. De Grot 2012 places value of ecosystem services in tropical forest between
1581 and 20,851 2007-$/ha. The median value of 2355 would give a monetary
value above 2 trillion dollars for 9 million km2 rainforest.
43. TEEB 2010
44. UNEP 2013 (GEO 5)
45. UNFF 2012
46. FAO 2011 includes a total of 30 countries, more countries than just the key
rainforest countries we refer to in this report.
47. Saachi et al. 2011
48. See WRI’s CAIT 2.0 (Ref.:http://cait2.wri.org/wri/Country%20GHG%20
Emissions?indicator[]=Total GHG Emissions Including Land-Use Change and
Forestry&indicator[]=Total GHG Emissions Including Land-Use Change and
Forestry Per Capita&year[]=2011&sortIdx=1&sortDir=desc&chartType=geo)
49. IPCC 2014b
50. UCS 2013
51. Black, R 2011
52. IPCC 2014 b
53.http://news.mongabay.com/2011/0323-species_migration.html
54. IPCC 2014c p. 15.
55. Science Daily 2014http://www.sciencedaily.com/
releases/2014/02/140226074522.htm and CD, T et al. (2004)http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14712274
56. The text is based on the report Rights-based rainforest protection,
Rainforest Foundation 2012, by Siri Damman and Ellen Hofsvang.
57. FAO 2014
58. According to a report by special rapporteur for UN Permanent Forum on
Indigenous Peoples, Vicky Tauli Corpus, the number is 200 million. See Forest
Peoples Program, 2012, footnote 18.
59. IWGIA website:http://www.iwgia.org/culture-and-identity/identification-
of-indigenous-peoples
60. Sobrevila, C. 2008.
61. Gorenfloa L.J., Romaineb S., Mittermeierc R.A., and Walker-Painemillad K. 2012
62. General Comment No. 23: The rights of minorities (Art. 27): 08.04.1994.
CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5, General Comment No. 23.http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/
doc.nsf/%28Symbol%29/fb7fb12c2fb8bb21c12563ed004df111?Opendocument
63. For further discussion of this, see Introduction; (Eds) Sikor, T. and Stahl J., 2011.
64. Sunderlin, W.D., 2011.
65. Nelson A., Chomitz K.M., 2011.
66. Securing Rights, Combating Climate Change: How Strengthening Community
Forest Rights Mitigates Climate Change. Rights and Resources Initiative and
World Resources Institute. July 2014.http://www.wri.org/securingrights
67. Victor M. Toledo. (Undated)
68. Ibid., note 47
69. FAO 2014
70. UNFF 2012
71. See e.g. study from East Kalimantan, Indonesia, before and after severe
flood: N. Liswanti, D. Sheil, I. Basuki, M. Padmanaba and G. Mulcahy, Falling
back on forests: How forest-dwelling people cope with catastrophe in a
changing landscape, International Forestry Review, Vol 13, no 4. 2011.
72. World Bank 2002.
73. CIFOR, papers can be downloaded here: http://www1.cifor.org/pen/
publications/pen-paper-download-registration-form.html
74. FAO 2011 and The World Bank, 2004
75. TEEB 2010
76. FAO 2011c
77. UNEP 2013 (GEO 5).
78. This section builds on FAO 2011c ‘Forests for improved nutrition and food
security’http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2011e/i2011e00.pdf
79. Ghazoul and Sheil 2010
2. Time for policy change
1. FAO 2010
2. Hansen, M. C. et al. 2013www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6160/850
3. Asner 2009; FAO 2011
4. FAO 2010 Several countries lack data for primary forest.
5. FAO 2010
6. FAO 2010
7. FAO 2011
8. Mackey, B. et al 2014
9. The Greenpeace GIS Laboratory, University of Maryland and Transparent
World, in collaboration with the World Resources Institute and WWF-Russia.
Available athttp://www.intactforests.org /
10.http://www.wri.org/news/2014/09/
11. FAO 2010
12. Peru:http://news.mongabay.com/2013/0613-peru-deforestation-
tracking-system.html DRC:http://www.un-redd.org/Newsletter43/DRCNFMS/
tabid/131881/Default
13. Hansen et al. 2013 and Mongabayhttp://news.mongabay.
Notes