Previous Page  58 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

158

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[DECEMBER, 1910

Brenan, R. T. Holmes, T. M. Gerrard, V.

Kilbride, S. M. Bell, A. H. Burne, B. G.

Barton, E. H. Burne, J. J. Cartan, T. H.

R. Craig, W. J. Ryan, M. C. O'Halloran,

G. E. G. White, G. T. C. Roe, C. H.

Monsarrat, W. G. Bradley, J. V. Murphy,

J. W. Dyas, F. R. M. Crozier, H. Bonass,

H. R. Maunsell, E. E. Merrick, J. Brady,

G. A. Byrne, W. J. Byrne, G. H. Parkes,

E. N. Edwards, C. Friery, J. Vanston, M.

Hayden, R. A. Andrews, C. H. Hardman,

C. P. O'Neill, E. McNeill, W. H. Geoghegan,

T. W. Fitzgerald, F. Gordon, E. Brady,

J. McDermott, M. A. Smyth, J. P. Collins,

P. Scales, H. D. Vaughan, E. St. C. Bell,

T. C. Perrott, C. P. Wilson, J. Barry Brown,

G. A. Overend, H. P. Mayne, J. Moore,

R. Scholefield, A. H. S. Orpen, F. H.

Croskerry, J. Minton.

The Secretary (Mr. W. G. Wakely) read the

notice convening

the meeting,

also

the

minutes of the Half-yearly General Meeting,

held upon 13th May, which latter were signed

by the President.

The President signed the audited accounts

of the Society for year ending 30th April,

1910.

The Secretary read the report of

the

Scrutineers of the Ballot for Election of

Council

for

the year ending

the 26th

November, 1911, which stated that the follow

ing had been returned unopposed as Pro

vincial Delegates :—Henry Blackall,

for

Munster; Thomas M. Greer, for Ulster;

M. M. Buggy, for Leinster; William P.

Kelly, for Connaught; and that the following

having received the number of votes placed

after their names, had been elected as the

thirty-one ordinary members of the Council:—

R. A. Macnamara, 232 ; W. S. Hayes, 232 ;

Sir A. Baker, 227; W. J. Shannon, 225;

'Sir G. Roche, 225; George Collins, 214;

Gerald Byrne, 207; William Fry, 206;

F. C. E. Bland, 205 ;

S. J. Brown, 203 ;

P. J. Brady, 203 ;

R. S. Reeves, 203 ;

W.

V. Seddall, 196; J. P. Lynch, 192; C. St.

G. Orpen, 192; J. W. Richards, 184; J.

A. Denning, 184 ;

G. Lyster, 175 ;

R. G.

Warren, 170 ;

H. J. Synnott, 167 ;

C. A.

Stanuell, 166;

I. J. Rice, 163; A. E.

Bradley, 161 ;

James Henry, 160; R. B.

White,

157;

C. Gamble,

152;

F. W.

Meredith, 148 ; T. C. Franks, 143 ; A. Lloyd-

Blood, 142;

J. G. Fottrell, 137; A. V.

Montgomery, 136.

And the following to

form a supplemental list to fill vacancies :—

T. W. Fitzgerald, 135 ;

James Moore, 120 ;

J. R. O'Connell, 119.

THE

PRESIDENT,

in moving

the

adoption of the Annual Report of the Council,

said :—The next business is that I should

move the adoption of the Annual Report.

I am glad to notice an increase in the member

ship—773, as against 756 last year. We

expected something more, having regard to

the new Bye-Laws we issued, but probably

they have not yet had sufficient time to

operate.

It is with the greatest regret the

Council have to record the death of Mr.

Galloway, who was for 24 years a member of

the Council. His death, occurring as it did

so suddenly, came upon us with a great

shock.

The most important matter in the Re

port

is

that

referring

to County Court

procedure. The question of the amendment

of County Court procedure so as to give

further

jurisdiction

in certain

important

matters, and to facilitate the more rapid

issue of decrees, has been the subject of

numerous attempts at

legislation. Lord

Ashbourne, when Lord Chancellor, took a

great interest in this matter, and introduced

in the House of Lords Bills dealing with the

subject, which passed that House on four

different occasions, in the years 1900, 1901,

1902 and 1905, but, I presume, owing to the

pressure of other business, those Bills only

received a first reading in the House of

Commons, and were not further proceeded

with.

The next step

in connection with this

question was the introduction in the House

of Commons, in the year 1907 by Mr. John

Gordon, K.C., M.P., of a measure which, I

believe, had the approval of the Recorder of

Dublin. This Bill, not having been dealt

within that year, was re-introduced by Mr.

Gordon in the year 1908.

It dealt only with

procedure in the County Court of Dublin,

but did not apply to any other part of

Ireland, and only obtained a first reading.

In the year 1909 an entirely new Bill was

introduced by Mr. Field, M.P., which also

only referred to the County and City of

Dublin.

It was one of three clauses, and

provided that the Lord Chancellor, with the