Previous Page  62 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

162

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland

[DECEMBER, 1910

depreciated Stock is the only solution of the

difficulty which the Treasury can find.

It appears from an answer given in the

House last April that out of the thousands of

direct pending sales 707 vendors had agreed to

accept payment partly in cash and partly in

2f per cent. Stock, amounting to in or about

7|- millions, and that 255 vendors were

accepting payment wholly in Stock repre

senting about 2 millions. But what are these

figures as compared with the whole ?

The question now arises : what is best to be

done by us in such a difficult situation ? What

can we as a profession advise our clients who

have already sold ?

What can we as a

meeting say to the public as to the solution

of this trouble ?

I have not referred to the hardships which

are entailed on land agents and on Solici

tors by reason of

the delay.

Is it not

hard on us professional men that year

after year should roll by before we get a

penny remuneration for all our trouble and

outlays ?

We, as a body, are guilty of no

delay whatsoever in connection with the

proceeding ; we have loyally endeavoured to

facilitate sales, and yet we are absolutely

impotent and helpless

in

the matter of

affecting expedition in the realisation of the

purchase money of an estate sold.

Can it be a matter of wonder if already

discontent at the present situation is being

expressed ?

Now to formulate an answer to

the points suggested is not an easy matter, but

for whatever they may be worth I venture

to express my personal views.

I know I am

speaking in the presence of men of large

experience in connection with the negotia

tions for the disposal of estates and the

carrying through of sales in the Land Com

mission, and

in all humility I give my

personal opinions.

My experience has been that amendments

of Land Acts which have involved drains on

the British Treasury have not been as

favourable to vendors and purchasers as

the original design of

the parent Act,

and,

therefore, profiting by that experi

ence,

it

seems

to me

desirable before

matters become worse, as possibly they may,

that advantage should, as far as possible, be

taken of the 1909 Act on the part of vendors

who have already disposed of their estates

under the Wyndham Act, but who now see

no immediate prospect of payment for the

estates thus sold.

I venture to suggest that vendors whose

circumstances

are

such

that

they

can

fairly

afford

to

hold Land Stock per

manently, had better take it. Thus they

would be practically investing their purchase

money in a 3 per cent, security, which, you

know, is equivalent to that of Consols.

If

in the future Land Stock recovers from its

present much depreciated price to the figure,

say, of 92, then it is evident sales could be

effected without loss, and if by any chance

Land Stock went over 92, vendors would

make a profit.

Now as regards vendors whose estates

were lodged in the Land Commission late

in the year 1908,

they seem

to me to

be

in

that position

that

they cannot

reasonably hope, as things are at present,

to be reached for payment for very many

years to come. Their cases are so far down

on the general list that the prospects are not

at all encouraging. Would it not be better

for them at once to apply for half Stock and

half cash or whole Stock ?

If they did so, in

all probability they would expedite their

sales by possibly two or three years, and if

they found that their expectation of a realisa

tion within a reasonable period was not likely

to be accomplished, why then they might

apply to replace their cases on the " All

Cash Register."

I know that such a re

placement on

the

" All Cash Register"

might involve their estates being placed at

the bottom of the list as it then may stand,

but would they be worse off than they are

to-day ?

Uncertainty looms large, as I have already

pointed out ;

political complications may

further

depreciate

the value

of

Land

Stock ;

future legislation may not be even

as beneficial to vendors and tenant purchasers

as the Act of 1909, although, as I have shown,

that Act has little to boast of, and the result

of the best deliberation that I personally

have been able to give to the subject is that,

having regard to all the circumstances and

the position of affairs generally in Ireland, it

would be well for vendors to reconsider the

situation and see whether they cannot accept

Stock under the 1909 Act, and so bring into