Previous Page  65 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

DECEMBER, 1910] The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

165

may be made and before whom they may

be made.

We also deal with the question of renewal of

decrees. At present a decree must be

renewed every year for the six years it is in

force. On the first year it is renewed by

affidavit of the plaintiff and without -notice to

the defendant, and each subsequent year upon

notice to him.

It was thought by some

persons that these renewal proceedings were

really matters

for

putting

costs

into

Solicitors' pockets, and for that purpose alone.

Now let me draw your attention to this

matter.

Judgments in the High Court must

be renewed every year and are executed by

the Sheriff alone, who is an officer of the

Court and amenable to the High Court and

answerable for his actions to the Court;

and if he made a seizure and was met by a

statement on behalf of the defendant that

the debt had been paid or almost paid by

him since the judgment was marked, the

Sheriff, as an officer of the Court, would

naturally stay his hand and make some

enquiry.

But then let us come to the procedure

under decrees. A decree need not be execu

ted by the Sheriff, but may be executed by

the plaintiff himself and his bailiffs. Now it

cannot be said that it is not necessary to

have a periodical enquiry as to the amount

that may be due upon that decree, and that

the defendant should not be asked to attend

on the renewal hearing with a view to seeing

that he is not unjustly treated by the plaintiff.

I say it would be a monstrous thing to put

into the hands of any pedlar or trader, no

matter what his position, a decree against a

defendant and enable him to have that in

his pocket for six years without being subject

to any revision, and that at the end of, say,

five years he would be entitled to walk in and

seize the goods of the defendant for the

entire amount of the decree.

Such a pro

position, to my mind, could not for one

moment be acceded to, and I am glad to have

to say that some of the authorities who were

consulted upon this Bill were in the first

instance opposed to the renewal of decrees,

but when they heard our statement as to what

actuated us in favour of the renewals and the

periodical revision of the sums due on these

i

decrees they did not press their objection

further, we waived

the renewal without

notice, but we think that the early revision

thereafter provided by our Bill is necessary,

and merchants or defendants cannot grumble

if they have to pay some small costs for the

hearing on renewal, which sum generally

falls on the defendant who has obtained the

long credit. The first renewal will be within

two years from the date of the decree.

There is a clause providing for the Court

to issue decrees in undefended cases after

six days from the date they are pronounced

by limiting the time for appeal;

this will

prevent decrees from being hung up until the

termination of a prolonged Sessions.

We also give powers to defendants to lodge

money in Court in full settlement of claims

for debts or for damages, and if on the

hearing, the amount tendered or lodged is

deemed by the Judge sufficient, that the

defendant who has so lodged that money

will be indemnified from costs after

the

lodgment was made by him.

There are other matters dealing with the

professional side, such as enabling firms of

Solicitors to act in Court by any member of

their firm, etc.

And then there is a clause that the Presi

dent of the Incorporated Law Society shall

be one of the rule-making authorities, and

there shall also be added a member of the

Council of the Bar of Ireland, to be nominated

by that Council, because we consider that the

Bar of Ireland have as great an interest in

the carrying on of the County Court business

as Solicitors, and that it is not out of place

that

they should be represented on

the

court of the rule-making authority.

I do not think it necessary to allude to

letters which have appeared in the press over

the name " A Correspondent," or any other

such

nom de plume.

If it is worth any indi

vidual's while to discuss the subject of the

Bill in the Publi: Press we always like to see

the true name of the writer appended to his

letter, it would guide us as to the amount

of attention to be given to his remarks.

I therefore refrain

from making any

fur

ther reference to them.

I am sorry I have kept you so long, but

I felt it my duty to go into this matter of

County Court Practice in Ireland at some

length, and the importance of the subject,

especially during the coming year, must be

my apology.