Previous Page  66 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

166

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[DECEMBER, 1910

Our thanks are due

to Mr. Patrick J.

Brady, M.P., who, I am glad to say, has been

elected a member of

this Council, and

the other Members of Parliament, members

of our Profession and the Bar, who have so

kindly introduced our Bill.

MR. JAMES BRADY :—I desire to make

one or two remarks about the County Court

Bill.

Personally, I think it does not go far

enough.

I

think

there should be some

provision to institute actions for breach of

promise, actions for libel and slander, in the

County Court. We are bound at present, at

great expense, to institute such actions in

the Superior Courts. They are generally

remitted, and when the case comes before the

County Court, the County Court Judges or

Recorders proceed to abuse the parties for

instituting the action in the Superior Courts.

I am sure Mr. P. J. Brady will give my

remarks the best attention, and try and have

this grievance redressed by the present Bill.

There is another matter, as far as Dublin is

concerned.

I don't think that Dublin is as

well served as regards procedure as the County

Court. A great deal of new business is cast

upon the Judges, and I think, therefore, they

ought to be relieved of what I call minor

business.

I think if the Court of Conscience

business was extended to £5 it would be a

great benefit to the mercantile community of

the city and would be a great relief to the

cqngestion that at present exists

in the

Recorder's Court in Dublin.

I know the

feeling of the mercantile community is to

have the jurisdiction of the Court extended

to £5, and have a legal gentleman put there

to carry out its duties.

MR. P. J. BRADY, M.P. :—There are

some occasions on which it is difficult to make

a speech, and this, at any rate, for me is one

of

them. But lest my complete silence

might be misunderstood, with the permission

of the President and Council, I would like

to say one or two words.

The first is that I can assure you I feel

inordinately proud of the distinction you

have conferred upon me to-day by making

me a member of the Council of the Incorpo

rated Law Society.

It is a distinction of

which any Solicitor might be proud, and I

take this opportunity of

thanking all the

members of my profession who have brought

about that result.

All I can say as to the

future is that I shall use every opportunity

given me, either in Dublin or elsewhere, of

promoting the interests of the profession of

which I am a member (applause).

I know full well that this is no place to

introduce politics.

It would be highly im

proper, and I have no intention of doing so.

But I do not think I would be introducing

politics if I suggest to you that my experience

of Parliament has brought me to the very

firm conclusion that a Solicitor was eminently

fitted to discharge parliamentary duties.

And no thanks to him for that, for I believe

the training which I received was one which

enables me to discharge my duties as

a

Member of Parliament perhaps a little better

than the ordinary layman who approached

parliamentary work.

It has been my -privilege to serve for five

consecutive weeks on a Private Bill Com

mittee. During that time one of the Bills

that came before us was the Great Northern

Railway Bill. That was a Bill in which our

profession and the public of Ireland were

vitally interested (hear, hear).

It may be

that the accident that I was serving on the

Committee led to the elimination from the

Bill of a highly objectionable clause, and one

prejudicial to the public interest—a clause

whereby no appeal would lie from a decision

of the Arbitrator.

I do not think I am

violating any secrets when I say that I told

my colleagues that the clause would riot be

got with my consent. The promoters of the

Bill did not get the clause.

Reference has been made to the County

Court Bill, which it was my privilege to

introduce into the late Parliament.

I hope

that Bill will be introduced into the next

Parliament, and certainly, as far as I am

concerned—apart altogether from the fact

that it was a Bill promoted by the Incorpo

rated Law Society—I was very proud and

glad of having been given the opportunity

of being its sponsor, along with other Members

of Parliament.

If the Bill finds its way to

the Statute Book, a great benefit will be

conferred on the mercantile community and

on all classes of litigants who practise in the

Recorder's Court and in the County Courts

throughout Ireland. Whoever is a member

for Dublin—while not subordinating his

political principles—ought

to

take

tvery

opportunity and make opportunities for him-