Previous Page  60 / 144 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 144 Next Page
Page Background

no evidence. The Court held that counsel had

impliedly elected to call no evidence, and in the

result allowed the appeal on the issue of liability

on the evidence as it stood at the trial, and direc

ted a new trial limited to the question of damages.

The latest case in point is Yuill

v.

Yuill (61 T.L.R.,

176). In that case the defendant's counsel sub

mitted at the end of the plaintiff's evidence that

he had no case to answer. Counsel's submission

failed and he was then allowed to call evidence

for the defendant. The action was dismissed and

the plaintiff appealed. The appellant argued

before the Court of Appeal that the defendant's

counsel, by making his submission as to no case,

had lost his right to call evidence and that, on

the Judge's ruling, judgment should have been

given for the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal held

that this argument was based on a mispprehension

as to the meaning of the rule, which did not mean

that counsel, by submitting no case,

ipso facto,

lost the right to call evidence. He loses that right

only if he elects to call no evidence either ex

pressly or impliedly. The rule amounts to no more

than a direction to the judge to put counsel to his

election and to refuse to rule on the submission

of no case unless Counsel elects to stand on it. If

through oversight or misapprehension the judge

does not put counsel to his election, and if no

election takes place, counsel is entitled to call

evidence notwithstanding the submission. The

practice in Ireland is not covered by any clear

authority. Practitioners will call to mind many

cases where no objection was raised to the pro

duction of evidence for the defence after the

failure of an application for a direction. The cases

above referred to show that a successful sub

mission of no case may be as dangerous as it

appears attractive, and that it is well to consider

it carefully in anticipation of subsequent events

should the plaintiff succeed in an appeal against

the verdict.

Interest on Estate Duty.

A member, who is also a public representative,

has written to say that representations were

recently made to the Minister of Finance in regard

to the practice of the Estate

Duty

Office of

assessing interest on estate duty down to the day

on which the duty itself is assessed, and not

merely to the day on which the account is lodged

in Dublin Castle. It was pointed out to the Mini

ster that the calculation of the interest in this

way was unfair to beneficiaries, when delay

occurs in the assessment of the duty, perhaps

through shortage of staff due to the emergency.

The Minister's

secretary

recently gave

the

following written reply : "The Minister desires me

to say that the long established practice in the

Estate Duty Office has been to charge interest on

estate duty to the date the duty is assessed. He

has had the matter considered, however, by the

Revenue Commissioners and is satisfied that in

certain cases where delay has occurred in the

office in dealing with the accounts it is unequitable

to charge interest for such delay. The Com

missioners are arranging that the practice be

altered."

OBITUARY.

MR. JOHN J. HAM, Solicitor, died on 25th January,

1945, at his residence, Halston, Moyvore, Co.

Westmeath.

Mr. Ham was admitted in Trinity Sittings,

1889, and practised at Ballymahon.

ME. JAMES F. D'ARCY, Solicitor, died on 30th

January, 1945, at his residence, 4 Mount Eden

Road, Donnybrook, Dublin.

Mr. D'Arcy served his apprenticeship with the

late Mr. William Frewen of Tipperary, was ad

mitted in Michaelmas Sittings, 1908, and practised

as senior partner in the firm of James F. D'Arcy

& Co. at Tipperary up to the year 1943 when he

retired.

Mr. D'Arcy was a member of the Council of the

Incorporated Law Society from 1935 to 1940 and

was Vice-President for the year 1939-40.

MR. THOMAS TAGGART, Solicitor, died on 19th

February, 1945, at Ballymoney.

Mr. Taggart served his apprenticeship with Mr.

Robert O'Neill of Coleraine, was admitted in

Trinity Sittings, 1893, and practised at Bally-

monev.

EXAMINATIONS—APRIL, 1945.

Examination

Date

Last date for giving notice

Final

April 9th & 10th

March 19th

Preliminary April llth & 12th

March 20th

68