Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  108 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 108 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

10

The impact of redemptions on a fund company is less

obvious than at an individual fund, but still quite

real. It’s a challenge that is facing more fund compa-

nies than usual.

I pulled the

50

largest calendar years of outflows in

percentage terms to hit any fund company in the

past

20

years. Remarkably,

10

of the

50

came in

2015

.

The next biggest year was the bear-market year of

2008

, when five firms had big redemptions. (I limited

the search to firms that had at least

$5

billion in

assets to begin the year.)

The

10

biggest percentage drops in open-end funds

from

2015

had outflows that ranged between

17

.

8%

and

26

.

0%

in a single calendar year. Fund companies

can certainly rebound from such an event, and they

have, but it does present new challenges. Asset man-

agement is a high-profit, low-debt business, and

that means fund companies generally have some

slack before flows hurt them.

Marsico Capital is one firm that has suffered a slow

burn as redemptions and poor performance have

gradually eaten away at its standing and led to depar-

tures in investment personnel. Marsico had an

unusually high level of debt because of a

2007

deal in

which it bought control back from

Bank of America

BAC

. That’s what I meant in the cover story by

subtle effects.

More broadly, outflows can spur staff cuts, harm

a firm’s reputation, hurt performance, and make it

tougher for a firm to recruit top talent. Let’s take

a look at those that are most worrisome among the

10

suffering outflows.

Third Avenue’s

26%

outflow tops any firm over the

past

20

years. Having a fund in the headlines

because of a mismatch of flows and holdings liquidity

will do that to you. The firm faces an investigation and

changes at the top, and investors are fleeing the

rest of the firm’s funds besides the one that imploded.

The reasoning is fear that problems at the firm will

lead to big changes or possibly key departures at the

other funds. Third Avenue is owned by Affiliated

Managers Group, which is on solid footing itself,

though

AMG

generally takes a hands-off approach

with its investment boutiques. If you own a Third

Avenue fund, you should watch developments closely.

It’s tough to come back from a severely damaged

brand. Even before the scandal, manager departures

and poor performance had led us to downgrade a

number of the firm’s funds.

Wasatch shed about

19%

of assets, and that’s

a concern given its emphasis on small-cap stocks in

most funds. The good news is the firm endured a

sizable drop in assets under management a decade

ago but was able to keep its investment team intact

and rebounded nicely. Still, I worry when I see this in

small-cap land.

Longleaf Partners is owned by the managers of its

funds along with some other employees, so the firm

is pretty well insulated from short-term issues.

If it were publicly traded you can be sure that changes

would be forced on the team. Still, it’s enduring its

worst performance slump ever and has seen

24%

in

outflows. I think Longleaf can withstand more, but

what it really needs is a rebound in fund performance.

Calamos

CLMS

outflows come at a bad time for the

publicly traded firm. John Calamos Sr. was thought

to be handing over the reins to Gary Black until the

two parted company. Now there is a pretty big hole

in transition plans at a time when performance has

been poor and investors are leaving in droves. The

firm saw

18%

of

AUM

go out the door in

2015

.

K

Fund Companies Under Fire

The Contrarian

|

Russel Kinnel

Our Contrarian Approach

I go against the grain to

find overlooked funds that may

be ready to rally.