Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  109 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 109 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

11

Morningstar FundInvestor

March 201

6

Concerned that your stock funds seem much more

volatile lately? You aren’t alone:

Vanguard 500

Index

’s

VFIAX

one-year standard deviation was at

14

.

28

at the end of January, compared with

10

.

93

for the three-year period, and most diversified U.S.

equity funds show a similar pattern. As observed

in the July

2015

FundInvestor

cover story, market vola-

tility declined after the financial crisis, but the

current three-year numbers may be the anomaly: Most

of the broad U.S. stock funds in the Morningstar

500

had

10

-year standard deviations on par with or

even higher than the current one-year figures—

Vanguard

500

Index’s

10

-year figure is

15

.

15

. In other

words, this recent surge in volatility probably doesn’t

signal a dramatic departure from established strategies.

There were a handful of funds, however, with one-year

standard deviations significantly higher than their

10

-

year figures. That could signal a change, perhaps for

the worse. One of those is

Sequoia

SEQUX

. As has

already been discussed in a recent Red Flags, its enor-

mous stake in controversial

Valeant Pharmaceuticals

VRX

is the culprit. That fund is not appropriate for

shareholders who can’t handle such stances, though

we continue to give it a Morningstar Analyst Rating

of Gold. Below is a look into six more funds that have

had notable increases in volatility during the past year.

T. Rowe Price New America Growth

PRWAX

This large-growth fund’s recent surge in volatility is

partly explained by the nearly

10%

stake in

Amazon.com

AMZN

held by manager Dan Martino at year-end.

That was to the fund’s advantage in

2015

, but not in

early

2016

. Martino is leaving the fund on April

1

,

and new manager Justin White expects to have more

of a valuation focus that would probably have pre-

cluded such a large stake in a pricey name. White is

an experienced analyst, but this is his first stint as a

portfolio manager, and this manager change, not the

fund’s increased volatility, explains the recent down-

grade of its Analyst Rating to Neutral from Bronze.

First Eagle Fund of America

FEAFX

The recent surge in volatility owes partly to the fund’s

sector biases, with an overweighting in basic mate-

rials that is among the largest in the mid-blend

Morningstar Category. Some of its tech picks have had

sharp losses as well. However, we are still positive on

the fund’s process, which has led to moderate volatility

over the long term. While we downgraded the fund

to Bronze from Silver, that owes to problems at First

Eagle itself, stemming from improper use of fund

assets for marketing and distribution costs, as well as

a pending acquisition by two private equity firms.

Harbor Capital Appreciation

HACAX

This fund showed its upside volatility with one of the

best showings in the large-growth category last year,

owing to high-priced, high-growth names such as

Amazon and

Facebook

FB

—a focus that is driving

above-average losses in

2016

. We remain confident

in Sig Segalas, who’s run the fund for

25

years, and

the rest of the growth team at Jennison Associates.

Mainstay ICAP Equity

ICAEX

and Mainstay ICAP Select Equity

ICSLX

These are both concentrated funds, particularly the

Select version, with fewer than

30

holdings. The

downside risk of such an approach was apparent in

both funds’ lagging returns during the past year.

We have concerns about changes on the manage-

ment and analyst teams, which are a particular

risk for a concentrated, distinctive strategy. Both

were downgraded to Neutral from Bronze in

2015

.

Century Small Cap Select

CSMVX

This fund had a good year in

2015

for a small-growth

strategy, ending the year in the black. Its losses for

the year to date aren’t extreme for the category, either.

While the fund’s long-term risk profile isn’t out of

line with the category norm, a concentrated portfolio

with pronounced sector bents is bound to be bumpy.

When we last rated the fund in

2014

, our primary

concerns were lackluster performance and changes to

the investment team, not volatility.

K

Contact Laura Lallos at

laura.lallos@morningstar.com

Beware of Rising Volatility

Red Flags

|

Laura Lallos

What is Red Flags?

Red Flags is designed to alert

you to funds’ hidden risks. Such

risks can take many forms,

including asset bloat, the

departure of a solid manager, or

a focus on an overhyped asset

class. Not every fund featured

in Red Flags is a sell, and in fact,

some are good long-term

holdings. But investors should

be prepared for a potentially

bumpier ride in the near future.