Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  212 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 212 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

18

You might not know much about the Morningstar

Medalists I’m looking at this month—those with the

smallest asset bases. There’s something of a theme,

too, as each one comes from a boutique firm. Some

are small even by boutique standards.

Funds like these would be larger than they are with a

big marketing staff to support them. Three of the

funds originated from old-fashioned firms that began

by running all of their clients’ money. Doing that

generally means that you take a conservative approach,

because clients might not be diversified across

a wide array of asset classes the way they’d be at a

bigger complex.

That’s why some have been lagging recently. It can

be tough for conservative funds to keep up in a strong

rally. Yet, the fact that they are different from

funds you’d find at a big fund company is part of their

appeal. I’ll take them from smallest to largest.

Berwyn

BERWX

has just

$130

million in assets and

a Morningstar Rating of

2

stars, so it would be easy to

skip over it. But you can see its appeal in the way

it held up in January and February

2016

. It lost much

less than its peers and now has a modest

4%

gain

through April. It also produced top-quartile perform-

ance in tough markets like

2011

and

2008

. The fund

seeks out good values among micro-cap stocks and

the small end of small caps. It also holds cash and

has a fondness for basic-materials stocks, which can

protect against inflation spikes. However, those

materials stocks stung in

2015

when commodities got

crushed. Lead managers Robert Killen and Lee Grout

are seasoned veterans who have steered the fund

through a variety of markets.

Royce Special Equity Multi-Cap

RSEMX

has likewise

shown it knows how to protect the downside. Charlie

Dreifus’ fund has a nifty

5

.

5%

return, landing in the

top

5%

of peers for the year to date. This is mainly on

the strength of the defensive qualities that share-

holders have long known about in his

Royce Special

Equity

RYSEX

. This fund, with a Morningstar Analyst

Rating of Bronze, has just

$135

million in assets,

however, because it was launched at the beginning of

2011

and hasn’t had much of a chance to show its

strengths. Its five-year returns are unimpressive, but

Dreifus’ conservative style is still a good bet for solid

risk-adjusted returns. It may take a bear market to win

more shareholders, but you don’t have to wait.

Mairs & Power Small Cap

MSCFX

earned a Silver

rating from us in June

2015

but remains at just

$209

million in assets. While Royce Special Equity

Multi-Cap took a time-tested strategy up in market

cap, Mairs

&

Power went in the other direction.

So far, things have gone very well for Andrew Adams,

who has produced top-decile performance for the

past one and three years. Adams has been with the

firm since

2006

and has run the fund since

2011

.

He looks for companies with strong balance sheets

and sustainable advantages, as do other Mairs

&

Power funds. Turnover clocked in at a low

23%

in

2015

, reflecting the patience of management.

Perkins Global Value

JGVAX

is part of Janus, so you

might think it could drum up some shareholders, but

the fund still has just

$227

million in assets. Perkins

chief investment officer Greg Kolb has largely matched

the returns of the benchmark and peers during his

tenure, but he’s done so with less risk. The fund lost

much less than peers and its benchmark in

2008

and

2011

. He looks for cheap stocks with strong cash

flows and healthy balance sheets. Defensive names

like

Procter & Gamble

PG

have held up nicely for the

fund in

2016

.

K

The Smallest Medalists

Tracking Morningstar Analyst Ratings

|

Russel Kinnel

What Are Morningstar

Analyst Ratings?

Our ratings are chosen for long-

term success. Analysts assess

a fund’s competitive advantages

by analyzing people, process,

parent, performance, and price.

They do rigorous analysis and

then submit their ratings to a

committee that vets their work

for thoroughness and consistency.