Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  5 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

3

Morningstar FundInvestor

January

2016

healthcare. Personnel also has been consistent. Harry

Burn

III

and Gibbs Kane Jr. have been running the

fund since

1985

, and comanager John DeGulis was

named manager in

2003

but has been with the firm

since

1996

.

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock

FLPSX

Joel Tillinghast just keeps on producing great results.

It’s a huge wide-ranging fund, but one that has

beaten its benchmark over the long haul with less risk

than the benchmark. Tillinghast looks for modest

valuations at firms with competitive advantages. He

invests quite a bit overseas, too. The fund’s

39%

foreign equity weighting puts it a hair below our cutoff

for world stock. The fund’s energy and materials

weightings are below the benchmark and peer group,

but Tillinghast’s biggest sector bet is on consumer

cyclicals, where he has

28%

of equities.

American Century Value

TWVLX

Phil Davidson and team have a

19%

energy weighting

and a minuscule materials weighting, but I’m including

it in the lower-risk bin unlike the other value funds

with big energy and materials bets. Davidson looks for

companies with defensible franchises whose shares

are in the cheapest third of the S

&

P

500

. His fondness

for yield also leads him to some of the oil majors.

Exxon Mobil

XOM

,

Chevron

CVX

, and

Occidental

Petroleum

OXY

are among its top holdings. Because

those companies operate across the oil-supply chain,

they tend to be less vulnerable to declining oil prices.

In fact, the fund has held up reasonably well. So, it’s

not as contrarian a play as those below but remains

an appealing core value fund.

Higher-Risk Investments

Value With Energy or Materials

Feeling really contrarian? How about a good value

fund with an overweighting in energy or materials?

Artisan Value

ARTLX

This slumping fund has

12%

in materials and

13%

in

energy. Needless to say, recent returns are lousy. Still,

the team’s longer track record at other funds shows

this is a decent bet for a rebound. The team looks for

cheap stocks but wants solid business models. Unfor-

tunately, the cheap have gotten cheaper, as the likes

of

Apache

APA

,

Goldcorp

G, and

Devon Energy

DVN

have been crushed. But that also means they could

produce big gains with just a little good news. I would

note, though, that we lowered the fund to Bronze

from Silver because of Scott Satterwhite’s planned

retirement in

2016

.

Vanguard Capital Value

VCVLX

This is one of Vanguard’s boldest funds. Peter Higgins

and David Palmer of Wellington manage separate

sleeves of the fund. We know from Higgins’ time

running this and another fund solo that he is a very

aggressive value investor who likes both deep-

value names and tech stocks. Palmer was added to

moderate Higgins’ side, but it is still a pretty bold

fund. Today, it has

9%

in materials and

14%

in energy.

Higgins’ long-term record is strong, though, so it’s

not a bad bet if you keep it as a small holding.

High Yield

High-yield fund managers talk about two markets.

There’s the hard-hit energy segment, where defaults

are growing and yields are in the

12%

13%

range.

Then there’s the rest, where yields are in the

5%

8%

range and the bumps have been few. That’s why a

category that only lost

5%

in

2015

has generated the

drama and teeth-gnashing usually associated with

much greater losses.

That presents investors with opportunity and danger,

as even a modest rebound could be a tremendous

boon for high-yield funds. In fact, we are hearing

more bond managers are looking at energy issuers

now that yields are much higher. At this point,

I might dip a toe in, but I wouldn’t buy with both

fists because I’m a cautious investor.

If you want to be really cautious, there’s

Vanguard

High-Yield Corporate

VWEHX

. The fund straddles

the line between investment-grade and high-yield.

Thus, you get less downside and less upside than

most high-yield funds, but low costs ensure you do

pretty well in the end.