Speech Pathology Australia: Speech Pathology in Schools Project
45
Brandel, J. & Loeb, D. F. (2011). Program intensity and service delivery models in the schools: SLP
survey results.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
, 42(4), 461–490.
Brent, M., Gough, F. and Robinson, S. (2001).
One in eleven: Practical strategies for teaching
adolescents with a language learning disability.
Melbourne: Aust Council for Ed Research.
Burns, M. K., Hodgson, J., Parker, D. C. and Fremont, K. (2011). Comparison of the effectiveness
and efficiency of text previewing and preteaching keywords as small-group reading comprehension
strategies with middle-school students.
Literacy Research and Instruction
, 50(3), 241–252.
Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C. and Rintamaa, M. (2013). Reading intervention in middle
and high schools: Implementation fidelity, teacher efficacy, and student achievement.
Reading
Psychology
, 34(1), 26–58.
Cirrin, F. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Language intervention practices for school-age children with
spoken language disorders: A systematic review.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in
Schools
, 39(1), S110–S137.
Dockrell, J., Lindsay, G., Roulstone, S. and Law, J. (2014). Supporting children with speech,
language and communication needs: an overview of the results of the Better Communication
Research Programme.
International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
, 49(5),
543–557.
Ehren, B. J. (2002). Speech-language pathologists contributing significantly to the academic success
of high school students: A vision for professional growth.
Topics in Language Disorders
, 22(2),
60–80.
Eisenmajer, N., Ross, N. & Pratt, C. (2005). Specificity and characteristics of learning disabilities.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
, 46(10), 1108–1115.
Faggella-Luby, M. & Wardwell, M. (2011). RTI in a middle school: Findings and practical implications
of a tier 2 reading comprehension study.
Learning Disability Quarterly,
34(1), 35–49.
Hempenstall, K. (2016). Read about it: Scientific evidence for effective teaching of reading. In
Jennifer Buckingham(Ed.).
Lang, L., Torgesen, J., Vogel, W., Chanter, C., Lefsky, E. and Petscher, Y. (2009). Exploring the
relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students.
Journal of Research on
Educational Effectiveness
, 2(2) 149–175.
Leading Learning 4 All. Retrieved March 2017, from
www.leadinglearning4all.edu.auLee, W., & Pring, T. (2016). Supporting language in schools: Evaluating an intervention for children
with delayed language in the early school years.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
, 32(2), 135-
146.
McCallum, R. S., Krohn, K. R., Skinner, C. H., Hilton-Prillhart, A., Hopkins, M., Waller, S. et al. (2011).
Improving reading comprehension of at-risk high-school students: The ART of reading program.
Psychology in the Schools
, 48(1), 78–86.
McLeod, S., & McKinnon, D. H. (2010). Support required for primary and secondary students with
communication disorders and/or other learning needs.
Child language teaching and therapy
, 26(2),
123–143.
Norbury, C. F., Gooch, D., Wray, C., Baird, G., Charman, T., Simonoff, E. et al. (2016). The impact
of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a
population study.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
, 57(11), 1247–1257.
Parsons, S., Law, J., & Gascoigne, M. (2005). Teaching receptive vocabulary to children with specific
language impairment: a curriculum-based approach.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
, 21(1),
39–59.
References