Background Image
Previous Page  21 / 88 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

EuroWire – July 2010

19

In a column on environmental issues – specifically, taconite

mining as a major source of air, land, and water pollution

– Karen Youso of the Minneapolis-St Paul (Minnesota)

Star Tribune discussed the recyclability of stainless steel.

According to the Washington-based trade association

Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA), all stainless

steel products are 100% recyclable, with a recovery rate of

between 60% and 85% typical. Many recycling companies

will want the grade types of the scrap segregated (all 300

series together, etc), SSINA said. The International Stainless

Steel Forum, based in Brussels, says that new stainless steel

products are made from about 60% recycled stainless. While

the dozens of steps involved in making stainless steel – from

mining the ore to producing the steel – all consume energy,

stainless recycling does not itself stress the environment

significantly more than processes for recycling other steels.

Telecom

Discuss: Those first in line to pay top price

for a new electronic device perform a

valuable service for the industry and the public

According to Apple Inc (Cupertino, California), first-month

sales figures for its iPad tablet computer indicate that it sold

more than twice as fast as the company’s iPhone did when it

was new. Apple said that it sold a million iPads in the US in the

28 days to 30

th

April, when the newer 3G model was delivered to

its first buyers. That model can access AT&T’s cellular broadband

network. The units sold to that point had only Wi-Fi access.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs said on 3

rd

May that US demand for the

iPad was still exceeding supply, but that the international launch

of the device was set for 10

th

May. One person who could not

wait is Sayuri Watanabe, who flew from Japan to be among the

first to get an iPad when it became available in the United States.

Her photograph in the

New York Times

shows a jubilant young

woman flanked by beaming personnel of the Apple store in

downtown San Francisco.

Why did Ms Watanabe do this, when the iPad was certain to

reach Japan before long? Even more puzzling is why she paid

top price when the iPad would be cheaper – and probably better

– in a matter of months. The

Times’

s Damon Darlin framed the

quandary in stark money terms.

“A tough lesson about buying early could have been learned

by the iPhone’s first buyers back in 2007,” he wrote. “Those

early adopters paid $600 for a phone. Two months later, Apple

dropped the price to $400. Then, in June 2009, it introduced a

better version, with twice the storage, for $200, one-third the

original’s price.” (“Applause, Please, for Early Adopters,” 7

th

May)

Mr Darlin collected the views of a number of experts, which

need not detain us. Most were variations on the theme of

enhancement of personal prestige through the early acquisition

of a novelty in short supply. The most engaging explanation for

this seemingly irrational behaviour was offered by a professor of

behavioural economics, who told the

Times

, “I realized years ago

that I derive great pleasure from buying a new gadget.”