Background Image
Previous Page  10 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

64

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 2 2015

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

approach (purposive sampling) allows researchers to recruit

participants with particular characteristics which will allow

them to answer the research questions (Guarte & Barrios,

2007).

Four male Australian residents with TBI, and two female

significant others (wife and defacto partner) participated in

the study. Three of the four men sustained a TBI through

a motor vehicle accident, the other following a physical

assault. Two of the male participants had returned to work

following their TBI, however only one was employed in his

previous capacity (see Table 1).

Data collection

PWTBI and their SOs completed online surveys (available

on request) prior to attending an in-person interview with

two researchers. The surveys were first piloted with speech

pathologists with extensive clinical and research experience

in the field of TBI, and further refined through the ethics

application process. Participants were informed that

assistance from a SO was permitted during survey

completion to mitigate any potential difficulties experienced

as a result of cognitive-communication or literacy

impairments. Surveys were completed online through the

web-based generator Survey Monkey.

Semi-structured interviews (30–45mins) were conducted,

with one interview taking place at the University of Queensland

campus and the remaining five via teleconference. These

interviews aimed to qualitatively explore the continuum of

care experienced by adults with a brain injury, employing a

topic list to ensure coverage of all relevant areas. Interviews

were audio recorded for later analysis. Ethical clearance for

this study was granted by the University of Queensland’s

Behavioural and Social Sciences Ethical Review Committee.

Interpretive phenomenology is a research methodology that

aims to analyse the significance of participant experiences

and offer insight into their own interpretation and

comprehension of these experiences (Tuohy, Cooney,

Dowling, Murphy, & Sixsmith, 2013). This methodology

allows the researcher to evaluate the data using qualitative

analysis, while still preserving objectivity and rigour. This is

achieved through a process known as “bracketing”, whereby

the everyday assumptions, attitudes, and prejudices of the

researchers are put aside to focus on describing the

participants’ experiences of the phenomenon in its purest

form (Tuohy et al., 2013). Interpretive phenomenology

allows the participants’ experiences to be classified under

general themes and summarised with the use of key quotes

that clarify each individual’s experience (Ivey, 2013). The use

of this coding system permits a level of insight into the key

issues experienced by persons with a TBI and their

significant others (SO) while accessing SLP services.

Participants

Two groups of participants were recruited for the project: (a)

adults of working age (18–65 years) who sustained a severe

TBI between 1998 and 2012 and who had accessed SLP

services following injury and (b) their nominated significant

other. An invitation to participate in the study was

disseminated via the e-newsletter and Facebook page of

Synapse (formally The Brain Injury Association of

Queensland), a disability organisation for those living with

acquired brain injury. The organisation is based in

Queensland, but is able to be accessed nationwide,

thereby providing reach to individuals throughout Australia.

Purposive sampling was also used to assist in recruitment

of individuals from states other than Queensland. This

Anna M. Copley

(top), and Naomi

A. MacBean.

Alastair D.

McRae photo

not supplied

Table 1: Participant details

Pseudonym Age Gender Time

since

injury

Location Role

Employment

status pre

TBI

Employment

status post

TBI

Stage of recovery where SP

was accessed

Gordon

26 Male

1 year

Vic

Person

with a TBI

Employed

Employed

Intensive care, inpatient

rehabilitation, outpatient

rehabilitation

Thomas

42 Male

15

years

Vic

Person

with a TBI

Employed

Unemployed

– Studying

Live-in rehabilitation

Mitchell

33 Male

7 years Qld

Person

with a TBI

Employed

Employed at

family firm

Intensive care, inpatient

rehabilitation, live-in

rehabilitation (biru), outpatient

rehabilitation, ongoing

rehabilitation

Mary

60 Female 2 years Qld

Significant

other

Employed

Retired

Outpatient rehabilitation, ongoing

rehabilitation

Trevor

34 Male

1 year

Qld

Person

with a TBI

Employed

Unemployed

– on a

disability

pension

Inpatient rehabilitation,

outpatient rehabilitation, ongoing

rehabilitation

Samantha

27 Female 1 year

Qld

Significant

other

Employed

Unemployed

– on a

disability

pension

Inpatient rehabilitation,

outpatient rehabilitation, ongoing

rehabilitation

Note.

Pseudonyms have been used to maximise participant privacy and confidentiality.