Background Image
Previous Page  6 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

60

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 2 2015

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

communication management in residential aged-care

settings. All participants indicated that they were unsure

about, how and whether speech pathology services

should adhere to broader aged-care legislation and

recommendations. When asked about current aged-

care funding assessments and aged-care standards,

participants made comments such as “I am not very

clear on this” (Participant 1), “Again it doesn’t roll off my

tongue with easy familiarity” (Participant 6), “I’m not sure

specifically” (Participant 7), “Not too sure, I assume it is a

set of standards that health professionals must comply with

in order to work with the aged population” (Participant 3).

Two participants who regularly conducted

communication management in the residential aged-care

settings they serviced both commented that the service

they provided was highly dependent on the involvement

of family members and friends of the resident. Family

members and friends were noted as the primary source of

referral for services to facilitate resident communication,

often fund the service, and take a lead role in carrying out

therapy tasks. Participant 8 discussed the role of speech

pathologists in advocating for communication management

in residential aged care:

If relatives around see me working with someone else

they might come and have a chat with me and ask

what I am doing, and say that looks great, can I ask

you about my relative … so I will have a chat with

them. I think speech pathologists can raise awareness

of what we can offer for communication and make this

appealing to residential aged-care facilities.

Theme 3: Speech pathologists have

a desire to advance communication

management in residential aged care

Of the 10 participants, eight commented that in “an ideal

world” they would like to increase services for

communication management in residential aged care. Most

participants emphasised the importance of facilitating social

communication among residents. Most participants also

commented on the importance of ensuring that the

individual communication needs of residents were assessed

and that interventions provided were tailored to meet these

needs. In doing so, participants acknowledged that all

residents are not the same, “They might all have dementia

but are still all very, very different” (Participant 3). All

participants discussed several different roles that speech

pathologists may take in facilitating resident

communication. These roles included as consultants and

doing “trouble shooting” (Participant 6) with both staff and

residents when communication breakdown occurred, as

educationalists providing training for residential aged-care

staff and family members in maximising communication

opportunity and success, and as clinicians providing both

individual and group assessment and intervention services.

Discussion

With national and international aged-care legislation and

reform recommendations emphasising the importance of

person-centred care and therefore the maintenance of

personhood (Productivity Commission, 2011; Department

of Health, 2012; WHO, 2002), services to facilitate effective

communication with clients are essential. In a setting such

as residential aged care, where the majority of clients

experience communication difficulty, there is marked

potential for speech pathology services to facilitate

Theme 2: Communication management

in residential aged care is limited and

impacted by numerous factors

All participants stated that referral for speech pathology

services and the nature of speech pathology services in

residential aged care is dominated by “swallowing”. Only

two of the 10 participants stated that they regularly

provided communication management in aged-care

settings. Participants also commented that communication

management is often not a priority of aged-care

management or care staff. One participant did, however,

state, “I think the nursing staff prioritise communication the

best way they know how” (Participant 3). Overall, most

participants indicated that prioritisation of communication

management in residential aged care by speech

pathologists would not necessarily translate to increased

aged-care sector prioritisation and support for

communication management.

All participants discussed the impact of lack of funding

in residential aged care for communication management.

Most participants discussed a lack of support from

speech pathology management to provide communication

management in residential aged care, and a lack of

specialist training for speech pathologists working in the

setting. All participants indicated that they felt strongly

that limited funding for communication management was

associated with many factors including: low prioritisation

of communication management by facility staff; lack of

acknowledgement of communication needs in aged-

care funding allocation tools; and limited awareness

by residential aged-care staff about, options for and

the benefits of, speech pathology services to facilitate

communication. Most participants also commented that

they themselves had limited knowledge regarding funding

options that were available for communication management

in residential aged care.

Further commenting on the support they received

from their own professional management, all participants

emphasised the negative impact of time and resource

limitations. As a result, all participants prioritised what they

were referred for – “swallowing”. One participant stated “I’m

aware of everything, aware of communication, but I know

I’ve got to hurry up and get out of there you know, I’m not

allowed” (Participant 1).

Many participants also indicated uncertainty about which

resources and communication intervention approaches

were best suited to meet residents’ needs. When asked

about the nature of services they would provide to facilitate

resident communication if given the opportunity, many

participants expressed uncertainty about the intervention

approach they would use, the areas of communication

they would target, and the outcomes they would hope to

achieve. This uncertainty largely related to the complex

nature of communication impairment among residents

of aged-care facilities, including the high prevalence

of cognitive impairment, degenerative disease, and

comorbidity.

All participants commented that they would welcome

further pre- and post-qualification training specific to

facilitating communication in residential aged care,

particularly for residents with cognitive-communication

impairment. Many participants also expressed a desire for

further training about expectations for client outcomes,

reporting uncertainty about the applicability of, and

means of implementing, a person-centred approach to