Background Image
Previous Page  4 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

Aged care

58

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 2 2015

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

KEYWORDS

AGED CARE

COMMUNICATION

QUALITY OF LIFE

SERVICE

PROVISION

SPEECH

PATHOLOGY

THIS ARTICLE

HAS BEEN

PEER-

REVIEWED

Michelle K.

Bennett (top),

Elizabeth C.

Ward

Challenges to communication

management in residential

aged care

Michelle K. Bennett, Elizabeth C. Ward, Nerina A. Scarinci, and Monique C. Waite

characteristics that are to be considered sacred and held

in deep respect by others (Kitwood, 1997). Personhood

provides the foundation for person-centred care, the

model of care on which current national and international

aged-care service provision recommendations are based

(Productivity Commission, 2011; Department of Health,

2012; World Health Organization (WHO), 2002). Inherent

within these service provision recommendations is an

emphasis on equal and shared contribution to health care

by the health professional and the service user (i.e., the

older person and their significant others), and a focus on

psychosocial models of service provision in addition to

biomedical models. In broadening service provision beyond

traditional biomedical care, person-centred care explicitly

supports health services to facilitate subjective well-being

and meaningful life participation (National Ageing Research

Institute, 2006).

For older people residing in residential aged care,

subjective well-being and meaningful life participation have

been found to be largely dependent on the availability of

opportunities and support to make life choices, express

one’s identity and sense of self, and continue to form and

maintain interpersonal relationships (Ball et al., 2000). With

social engagement, self-expression, decision-making, and

the initiation and maintenance of relationships dependent

on effective communication (Nilsson, Ekman, Ericsson,

& Winblad, 1996), the provision of support for residents

with communication difficulty is, therefore, essential. Past

research indicates that as many as 98% of older people

living in residential aged care experience communication

difficulty (Worrall, Hickson, & Dodd, 1993). Further, for all

residents, communication interaction has been found to be

limited in both scope and frequency, to be care focused,

and largely directed by care staff (Carpiac-Claver & Levy-

Storms, 2007; Savundranayagam, 2014).

As specialists in the assessment and management

of communication difficulties speech pathologists have

the potential to take a lead role in the delivery of person-

centred care, and the facilitation of resident participation

and subjective well-being. At present, little is known

about communication management provided by speech

pathologists in residential aged-care settings. Therefore,

this study aimed to explore the perceptions of speech

pathologists about the importance of, nature of, and factors

influencing communication management in the setting.

The findings of this study may be used to inform both the

current and future direction of speech pathology services in

residential aged-care settings.

Communication enables the expression of a

person’s fundamental attributes, defined as

one’s personhood. Communication

impairment threatens personhood, reducing

autonomy and independence, limiting self-

expression, and restricting interpersonal

relationships. The majority of older

Australians living in residential aged care

experience communication impairment, yet

speech pathology services provided in this

setting are limited. With an ageing population

and global focus on person-centred aged

care, there is a need to better understand

issues impacting communication

management in residential aged-care

settings. To facilitate this understanding,

individual, in-depth, semi-structured

interviews were conducted with 10 speech

pathologists working in residential aged care.

Qualitative content analysis revealed

disparate opinions among participants about

the importance and nature of communication

management in the setting. Numerous factors

challenging clinicians’ ability to provide

services for communication in the setting

were discussed. Despite these challenges,

the majority of participants expressed a

desire to expand communication

management in residential aged care.

T

here is a growing body of research illustrating the

negative impact of communication impairment on

quality of life (Cruice, Worrall, Hickson, & Murison,

2003; Hilari & Byng, 2009; Morgan, Hickson, & Worrall,

2002; Park et al., 2013; Yorkston, Bourgeois, & Baylor,

2010). The impact of communication impairment increases

with ageing (Yorkston et al., 2010), presenting a significant

barrier to an older person’s ability to adapt to the ageing

process (Lubinksi & Welland, 1997), and to preserve and

express one’s personhood in his or her later years (Kitwood,

1997; Lubinksi & Welland, 1997; Yorkston et al., 2010).

Personhood is defined as a person’s individual and unique