Background Image
Previous Page  7 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 60 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 2 2015

61

then be communicated to aged-care facility management

and care staff, with speech pathologists taking the role

of educationalist to raise awareness of opportunities to

facilitate communication with residents with cognitive

communication impairment. To achieve and sustain

long-term change, current and future models of speech

pathology service provision in residential aged care must be

reviewed to better align with person-centred care. In doing

so, the importance of effective communication in enabling

meaningful life participation and facilitating subjective well-

being must be highlighted.

Conclusion

As the population ages, the demand for speech pathology

services in residential aged-care facilities will increase. As

the majority of older people in residential aged-care facilities

experience communication difficulty, greater attention is

needed to determine how the speech pathology profession

can optimise services to facilitate communication. Current

speech pathology services targeting communication are

limited and impacted by numerous barriers within and

outside of the profession. The current data indicates that

speech pathologists in this setting have a desire to increase

the profile of communication management in residential

aged care. Current aged-care legislation and reform is based

on the principles of person-centred care and, thereby,

provides a legislative platform on which to advocate for

communication management in aged-care settings. As

such, there is an opportunity for the profession to align itself

with current aged-care legislation and reform, raise the

profile of communication, and position the profession as a

key player in the delivery of care to older people.

References

Ball, M. M., Whittington, F. J., Perkins, M. M., Patterson, V.

L., Hollingsworth, C., King, S. V., & Combs, B. L. (2000).

Quality of life in assisted living facilities: Viewpoints of

residents.

Journal of Applied Gerontology

,

19

(3), 304–325.

Bennett, M., Ward, E., Scarinci, N., & Waite, M. (2014).

Perspectives on mealtime management in long-term aged

care facilities in New South Wales, Australia: Insights from

a cross disciplinary investigation.

Journal of Nutrition in

Gerontology and Geriatrics

,

33

, 325–339.

Carpiac-Claver, M. L., & Levy-Storms, L. (2007). In

a manner of speaking: Communication between nurse

aides and older adults in long-term care settings.

Health

Communication

,

22

(1), 59–67.

Casper, M. L. (2013). Speech-language pathology in the

long-term care setting: It isn’t your Grandmother’s nursing

home anymore.

Seminars in Speech and Language

,

34

(1),

29–36.

Department of Health. (2012).

Living longer living better

.

Canberra: Department of Health, Australia.

Cruice, M., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Murison, R.

(2003). Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia:

Social and emotional health, and psychological well-being.

Aphasiology

,

17

(4), 333–353.

Hilari, K., & Byng, S. (2009). Health-related quality of

life in people with severe aphasia.

International Journal of

Language & Communication Disorders

,

44

(2), 193–205.

Hoffart, N. (1991). A member check procedure to

enhance rigor in naturalistic research.

Western Journal of

Nursing Research

,

13

(4), 522–534.

Hopper, T., Cleary, S., Oddson, B., Donnelly, M. J., &

Elgar, S. (2007). Service delivery for older Canadians with

dementia: A survey of speech-language pathologists.

communication. In doing so, speech pathologists may

further highlight the link between communication and

participation, and between communication, subjective

well-being, and person-centred care. In addition, the profile

of this client group both within the speech pathology

profession and in the wider health service and political

arena may be raised.

Achieving service change for communication in

residential aged care will, however, first require profession

specific change. This Australian-based study supports

prior international research (Hopper, Clearly, Oddson,

Donnelly, & Elgar, 2007) indicating a degree of uncertainty

and inconsistency among speech pathologists working

in residential aged care. Key challenges include (a)

inconsistency in perceptions about the importance and

prioritisation of communication management in the setting

and (b) uncertainty about the validity of assessment and

intervention approaches with the client population, given the

high prevalence of cognitive impairment and degenerative

disease (Hopper et al., 2007). The current study also

confirms the findings of previous studies indicating that the

management of “swallowing” is the primary focus of speech

pathology professional services in residential aged care

(Bennett, Ward, Scarinci, & Waite, 2014; Casper, 2013;

Hopper et al., 2007).

Further factors discussed that may inhibit speech

pathology services for communication in residential aged

care included resource constraints, lack of awareness of

aged-care facility staff about communication management

and the role of speech pathologists in providing this care,

and limited education for speech pathologists specific

to providing communication management in aged-care

settings. These barriers are consistent with barriers

identified as also inhibiting speech pathology management

of mealtime difficulties in Australian residential aged care

(Bennett et al., 2014). The impact of these barriers on

both communication and mealtime management suggests

the need for wider consideration of speech pathology

service provision in residential aged care, including further

exploration of the perceptions of a larger cohort of speech

pathologists working in the setting. Such exploration may

better guide training for speech pathologists working with

older people and in residential aged-care settings, and

may further assist in clarifying the current position of the

profession in providing aged-care services.

Despite the challenges faced in working in residential

aged-care settings, speech pathologists in the current

study expressed a strong desire to expand communication

management in the setting. To assist the majority of the

resident population who experience communication

difficulty as well as staff caring for these residents, and

speech pathologists working in the setting, the profession

must unite in advocating for the need for speech pathology

services for communication in residential aged care. With

current aged-care legislation and reform founded on the

principles of person-centred care, there is current legislative

support for communication management in the setting.

To assist speech pathologists entering the profession

and clinicians already working in the setting, pre- and

post-qualification training relevant to residential aged care

must ensure clinicians are aware of challenges inherent

in working in aged-care settings, and strategies to

address these (Bennett et al., 2014; Hopper et al., 2007).

Training in the management of cognitive-communication

impairment and appropriate expectations for treatment

outcomes must also be prioritised. This knowledge must