Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  148 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 148 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S135

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Using multi-atlas (MIR) compared to single-atlas (RS) for

prostate RT showed better in 19, similar in 2 and worse in

3 out of the 24 volumetric parameters. Even though the

results are promising, discordances could lead to large

DVH parameters differences.

OC-0264 Assessment of Atlas based auto-segmentation

in Breast Contouring

P.H. Fok

1

, W.K. Fung

1

, C.H.P. Ho

1

, G. Chiu

1

1

Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Department of

Radiotherapy, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR China

Purpose or Objective

To investigate the efficiency and accuracy of atlas based

auto-contour segmentation (ABAS) for radiotherapy of

breast cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Contour sets of 80 breast cancer patients were recruited

to build an atlas in MIM Software for ABAS purpose. They

consisted of structures including CTV, PTV, and OARs

including the esophagus, heart, liver, spinal cord and

contralateral breast. ABAS was evaluated by comparing

auto segmented contours with manually drawn contours

using Dice Similarity coefficients (DSC) and Hausdroff

distance (HD). CTV and contralateral breast were

dissected into superior, inferior, medial, lateral, anterior

and posterior portions (Fig.1) for individual evaluations of

their accuracy of ABAS. The study consisted of two parts.

Part A: All patients from the atlas were used as the test

subjects and the patient who was selected as the test

subject would be excluded from the atlas. Manual

contours of each subject were compared with those that

were generated by ABAS. Part B: Another 16 patients with

breast cancer were randomly recruited to evaluate the

efficacy of ABAS in clinical practice. The time required for

manual contouring and contouring by ABAS with or without

manual refinement were compared. Radiation Oncologists

(ROs) were asked for their satisfactory levels regarding the

ABAS generated contours.

Fig.1

Results

Part A

The comparison results of the ABAS generated contours

and the manual contours were listed in Table 1. High levels

of agreement (DSC=0.8 to 1) were shown in the right lung,

left lung, liver, heart, spinal cord and left breast PTV;

moderate levels of agreement (DSC=0.7 to 0.79) were

shown in the left breast (CTV, contralateral breast) and

the right breast (CTV, PTV, contralateral breast); poor

agreement (DSC<0.69) was shown in the esophagus.

The lateral portions of the CTV, PTV and contralateral

breast for both left and right sided breast cancer patients

had the largest volume differences among the other

portions. Thus, the lateral portion of the breast contour

required the most refinement.

Part B

Level of agreement and s atisfaction improvement were

shown after refinement on AB AS generated TVs, with the

mean DSC increased from 0.861 to 0.979 and the

satisfaction score (range:1-5 ) increased from 2.2 to 4.3.

The mean time for ROs to manually contour TVs and to

modify ABAS generated TVs with refinement was 26.8 and

15.3mins respectively. The DSC, mean time for manually

contouring OARs and that for ABAS generated contours

with refinement were as follows: heart (DSC=0.949; 8.2

and 7.3mins), liver (DSC=0.904; 24.8 and 20.5mins),

esophagus (DSC=0.556; 7.6 and 11.3mins), spinal cord

(DSC=0.855; 9.2 and 10.4mins) and contralateral breast

(DSC=0.904; 24 and 18mins).

Conclusion

ABAS could speed up the contouring process especially in

target delineation during breast patient treatment

planning. However, improvement in the a lgorithm is still

needed and auto post-ABAS refinement has to be

developed to further increase its efficiency for clinical

practice.

OC-0265 Evaluating variability of contouring using

ESTRO guidelines for elective breast cancer

radiotherapy

D. Megias

1

, M. Sydenham

2

, D. Wheatley

3

, M. Maclennan

4

,

E. Spezi

5

, A.M. Brunt

6

1

Mount Vernon Hospital, National Radiotherapy Trials

Quality Assurance Group RTTQA, Northwood, United

Kingdom

2

Institute of Cancer Research, ICR Clinical Trials and

Statistics Unit, Sutton, United Kingdom

3

Royal Cornwall Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Truro,

United Kingdom

4

Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Cancer Services, Edinburgh,

United Kingdom

5

Cardiff University, School of Engineering, Cardiff,

United Kingdom

6

Royal Stoke University Hospital & Keele University,

Cancer Centre, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

Outlining of target and OAR volumes is an integral part of

the radiotherapy pathway but inherently subject to

variability. With an emerging body of evidence supporting

regional nodal irradiation in early breast cancer, there is

continued emphasis for optimal, standardised and