Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  443 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 443 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S428

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

lines. Negative MLC errors were not performed at

Institution 2, due to differing equipment.

The automated VMAT plans from institution 3 were similar

in pass rate to the manually planned VMAT for collimator

errors, despite the difference (higher magnitude for

manual VMAT plans) in error magnitude. This could be

caused by the higher MLC modulation in the automated

plans.

Conclusion

Not all deliberately introduced errors were discovered for

VMAT plans using a typical 3%/3mm global gamma pass

rate (for 10% threshold with correction off). Consistency

between institutions was low for plans assessed utilising

differing devices and software. A 2%/2mm global analysis

was most sensitive to errors.

PO-0809 A 3D polymer gel dosimeter coupled to a

patient-specific anthropomorphic phantom for proton

therapy

M. Hillbrand

1

, G. Landry

2

, G. Dedes

2

, E.P. Pappas

3

, G.

Kalaitzakis

4

, C. Kurz

2

, F. Dörringer

2

, K. Kaiser

2

, M. Würl

2

,

F. Englbrecht

2

, O. Dietrich

5

, D. Makris

3

, E. Pappas

6

, K.

Parodi

2

1

Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, Medical Physics,

Munich, Germany

2

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department

of Medical Physics, Munich, Germany

3

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical

Physics Laboratory- Medical School, Athens, Greece

4

University of Crete, Department of Medical Physics,

Heraklion, Greece

5

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department

of Radiology, Munich, Germany

6

Technological Educational Institute, Radiology &

Radiotherapy Department, Athens, Greece

Purpose or Objective

The high conformity of proton therapy (PT) dose

distributions, attributed to protons stopping in the target,

is also the main source of uncertainty of the modality. PT

is sensitive to errors in relative stopping power to water

(RSP) uncertainties and to density changes caused by

organ motion. The ability to verify PT dose distributions in

3D with a high resolution is therefore a key component of

a safe and effective PT program. Existing 2D dosimetric

methods suffer from shortcomings attributed to LET

dependence, positioning uncertainties, limited spatial

resolution and their intrinsic 2D nature. Recent advances

in polymer gel dosimetry coupled to 3D printing

technology have enabled the production of high

resolution, patient specific dosimetry phantoms. So far

this approach has not been tested for PT.

Material and Methods

A 3D-printed hollow head phantom derived from real CT

data was filled with VIPAR6 polymer gel and CT scanned

for pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatment planning,

following RSP characterization of the gel and the 3D

printer bone mimicking material (see Figure 1). All

irradiations of phantoms were carried out at the Rinecker

Proton Therapy Center in Munich, which is dedicated for

PBS. An anterior oblique SFUD plan was used to cover a

centrally located cerebral PTV, following the standard

operating procedures of the PT facility. The field was

crossing the paranasal sinuses (see Figure 2A) to test the

TPS modelling of heterogeneities. 3D maps of the T2

relaxation time were obtained from subsequent MR

scanning of the phantom and were converted to relative

dose. The dose response linearity and proton range were

verified using separate mono-energetic irradiations of

cubic phantoms filled with gel from the same batch.

Relative dose distributions were compared to the TPS

predictions using gamma analysis.

Figure 1.

3D printed patient-specific head phantom filled

with dosimetric gel during the treatment planning

process.

Results

Results from mono-energetic irradiation of the cubic

phantoms showed proton range agreement to the TPS

within 1 mm for 90 MeV and 115 MeV, supporting the SPR

gel characterization accuracy. Dose-response linearity was

confirmed for the delivered dose range, except at the

Bragg peak position where a LET dependence was

revealed. Gamma index and relative dose distribution

profiles showed good agreement between TPS and gel, as

shown in in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Slice of the 3D SFUD dose distribution

converted from a T2 relaxation map obtained from MR

scanning

the irradiated 3D printed head phantom filled with

polymer gel. The PTV is indicated in white. (B) Gel

(RTsafe) and

TPS

dose profiles along the path marked in red in (A). (C)

3%/2mm gamma index along the profile.

Conclusion

In this work we have shown that patient-specific 3D

polymer gel dosimetry is applicable to PT using PBS.

Further characterization and correction of the LET

dependence and comparison to MC dose calculations will

be carried out and presented.

Acknowledgements:

DFG-MAP

PO-0810 Absolute dose pre-treatment Portal Dosimetry

using the Varian MAASTRO implementation

A. Taborda

1

, J. Stroom

1

, C. Baltes

2

, A. Seabra

1

, K.

Dikaiou

2

, C. Greco

1

1

Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Clinical

Department, Lisboa, Portugal

2

Varian Medical Systems, Varian Medical Systems Imaging

Laboratory, Baden-Dättwil, Switzerland