Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  46 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S33

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 1.

Total number of features per category with a

minimum CCC>0.85 before and after wavelet filtering in

all three datasets. Shape features are not calculated after

wavelet filtering.

Conclusion

We found a high agreement between radiomics feature

stability based on 4DCT and test-retest data in lung

cancer, meaning that 4DCT can be used as alternative to

test-retest to eliminate unreliable features. For

oesophageal cancer a subset of 205 stable CT radiomics

features was identified, of which 64 (31%) were not stable

in NSCLC. This underlines the need for tumour-specific

feature selection prior to model building.

OC-0068 Heterogeneous dose escalation in lung: How

robust are high FDG-uptake volumes during

radiotherapy?

A. Haraldsen

1

, C. Lutz

2

, L. Hoffmann

2

, A. Khalil

3

, D.

Møller

2

1

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Nuclear

Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus C, Denmark

2

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Medical

Physics, Aarhus C, Denmark

3

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology,

Aarhus C, Denmark

Purpose or Objective

The Danish NARLAL 2 Trial (NCT02354274) compares 18F-

fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-guided dose escalation to the

current standard radiotherapy (RT) treatment (66Gy/33fx

homogeneously). The dose is escalated heterogeneously

delivering mean doses up to 95Gy/33fx to the high FDG

uptake volumes of the primary tumour aiming to improve

local control for patients with locally advanced Non-small

Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we investigated

the robustness of these high FDG uptake regions within the

Gross-Tumour-Volume (GTV) during the first weeks of RT

and we calculated the influence of these changes on the

dose coverage.

Material and Methods

We evaluated three successive FDG-PET/CT scans

performed on 20 patients. The baseline scan (PET/CT0)

was dated 14 days prior to RT. The first and second scan

during RT were performed on the same scanner at day 7

(PET/CT1) and 14 (PET/CT2). These two scans were rigidly

registered to CT0 on the primary tumour. A sub-volume,

defined by a threshold of 50% of the Standardized Uptake

Value peak (SUVpeak), was delineated within the GTV on

each scan (V0

50,

V1

50

and V2

50

). The overlap of the volumes

was evaluated with the widely used overlap fraction (OF)

and the OF-boost (see definitions in Fig. 1). The OF-boost

specifies the fraction of respectively V1

50

or V2

50

that is

included in the initial escalation volume, V0

50,

and is thus

more clinically relevant for this trial. The escalated dose

plans were then recalculated on CT2 and the dose to V2

50

was compared to the planned dose to V0

50

on CT0 to

estimate the effect of varying FDG uptake on the dose

coverage.

Results

Median values for OF

0-1

and OF

0-2

were 0.79 [0.56;0.91] and

0.85 [0.58;0.95]. OF-boost

0-1

and OF-boost

0-2

yielded

slightly lower median values of 0,77 [0,52-0,91] and 0.82

[0,58-0,92], respectively.

For 70% of the patients, we found an OF-boost>70% for all

scans (Fig. 2 (a)). These patients showed only small or no

dose decrements to V2

50

(maximum 1,3 Gy), indicating

that a 70% OF-boost is sufficient to maintain the initial

escalation dose. In 30% of the patients, the OF-boost

dropped below 70% (Fig. 2 (b)) and the mean dose to the

high FDG uptake volumes decreased with up to 4 Gy. For

these patients, we found that SUV peak declined to ~2

times background activity, rendering the definition of V1

50

and V2

50

questionable.

Conclusion

For the majority of the patients, the high FDG uptake sub-

volume and the escalated dose level were maintained

during RT. For 30% of the patients, the OF-boost decreased

below 70% and a drop in dose coverage to the high FDG

uptake volumes was observed. For these patients the

definition of a 50% of SUV peak volume during RT was

questionable due to low SUV peak values.