Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S32

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

This study is based on 4D-CBCT and 4D-CT scans of 19 non-

small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients subjected to

curatively intended radiotherapy initiated between March

2012 and August 2014. Lung ventilation was measured as

voxel-wise Jacobian determinants (JD) computed by

deformable image registration between expiration phases

and inspiration phases. All image registrations were

carried out by the freeware tool elastix

(elastix.isi.uu.nl)

.

4D-CT scans acquired before treatment were chosen as

gold standard for ventilation. The clinical 4D-CBCT

projection images of the first treatment fraction were

improved by the procedure described in [PMB, 15, 5781,

2016], which corrected projections for image lag, detector

scatter, body scatter, and beam hardening. Clinical and

improved projection images were binned and FDK-

reconstructed by software in the RTK-package

(www.openrtk.org

). All CBCT reconstructions were rigidly

resampled into CT-space. Before deformable image

registration a 1x1x1cm wide median filter was applied on

all images. For each patient the clinical 4D-CBCT JDs and

the improved 4D-CBCT JDs were voxel-wise compared to

4D-CT JDs by Spearman correlation and the resulting

correlation coefficients were analysed by a paired t-test.

Results

The clinical projection images were improved successfully

and both versions of projection images were reconstructed

to 4D-CBCT. Deformable registrations were carried out on

clinical 4D-CBCT, improved 4D-CBCT, and 4D-CT. The

sample mean for correlations between clinical 4D-CBCT

and 4D-CT JDs was 0.297±0.154 while the sample mean for

clinical 4D-CBCT and 4D-CT JDs was 0.362±0.106 (±1 SD).

A paired t-test of the Fisher transform correlation values

showed the difference to be statistically significant

(p=0.047).

Conclusion

Ventilation computed from clinical 4D-CBCT and improved

4D-CBCT were compared to 4D-CT ventilation. The

improved 4D-CBCT ventilation correlated better with

4DCT ventilation, suggesting that the improved 4D-CBCT

are superior to clinical 4D-CBCT for measuring lung

ventilation. Further improvements on measuring lung

ventilation from 4D-CBCT may possibly be achieved by

adding iterative reconstruction.

OC-0067 4DCT imaging to assess radiomics feature

stability: an investigation for thoracic cancer

R.T.H.M. Larue

1

, L. Van De Voorde

1

, J.E. Van Timmeren

1

,

R.T.H. Leijenaar

1

, M. Berbée

1

, M.N. Sosef

2

, W.M.J.

Schreurs

3

, W. Van Empt

1

, P. Lambin

1

1

Maastricht University Medical Centre - GROW-School for

Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of

Radiation Oncology - MAASTRO, Maastricht, The

Netherlands

2

Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Surgery,

Heerlen, The Netherlands

3

Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Nuclear

Medicine, Heerlen, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

For several tumour sites it was shown that quantitative

radiomics features, derived from CT images, unravel

valuable prognostic information. However, the large

number of available features increases the risk of

overfitting. Typically, test-retest scans allow to reduce

this number by selecting a robust feature subset.

However, these test-retest scans are not available for all

tumour sites. Hence we hypothesized that different

phases of respiratory-correlated 4D CT-scans (4DCT) can

be used as alternative to test-retest imaging to select

robust features. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the

repeatability of 542 radiomics features in a test-retest and

two 4DCT datasets of lung and oesophageal cancer

patients.

Material and Methods

The publically available RIDER dataset, consisting of test-

retest CT-scans of 27 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

patients, and 4DCT-scans of 22 NSCLC (4D-Lung) and 20

oesophageal cancer patients (4D-OES) were analysed. The

4DCT-scans contained 8 phases of the breathing cycle. The

gross tumour volume (GTV) of the primary tumours were

manually delineated. In total, 70 radiomics features

describing the tumour shape, intensity and texture, and

472 wavelet-filtered features were calculated within the

GTVs. A concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) ≥ 0.85

was used to identify robust features, either between the

test-retest scans or over all phase pairs in the 4DCT scans.

Results

Unfiltered features in general showed a higher robustness

than wavelet-filtered features. In total 34/70 (49%)

unfiltered features and 122/472 (26%) wavelet features

were stable in both the test-retest dataset and the 4D-

lung dataset. The four features selected previously to be

prognostic in lung and head-and-neck cancer (Aerts et al

2014), had a minimum CCC > 0.95 in both datasets. In the

4D-OES dataset 205/542 (38%) features showed a high

robustness, of which 42 unfiltered and 99 wavelet-filtered

features were also stable in the 4D-lung dataset. Due to

the fact that the image acquisition settings and hardware

were exactly the same in the 4D-lung and 4D-OES scans,

this partial disconcordance suggests that the remaining

stable features might be tumour site specific.

Figure 1.

Venn chart visualizing the overlap of stable

features with CCC>0.85 in the RIDER, 4D-lung and 4D-OES

dataset.