Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  473 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 473 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S458

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

7

IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Radiotherapy,

Milano, Italy

Purpose or Objective

A Poisson-based TCP model of 5-year biochemical

recurrence-free survival (bRFS) after post-prostatectomy

radiotherapy (RT) was previously introduced: best

parameters values were obtained by fitting a large (n=894

≥pT2, pN0, hormone-naïve patients) multi-centric

population including data from five prospective /

Institutional series; a satisfactory internal validation was

performed. Current investigation dealt with an

independent external validation on a large group of

patients pooled from two independent Institutional

databases with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Material and Methods

Based on the original model, bRFS may be expressed as: K

x (1-exp(-αeff D))

CxPSA

where: D is the prescribed dose; αeff

is the radiosensitivity factor; C is the number of clonogens

for pre-RT PSA=1ng/ml, assuming PSA to be proportional

to tumor burden; K (equal to 1-BxPSA) is the fraction of

patients who relapse due to clonogens outside the treated

volume, depending on pre-RT PSA and Gleason Score (GS).

The model works well when grouping patients according

to their GS value: best-fit values of αeff (range: 0.23-

0.26), C (10

7

) and B (0.30-0.50) were separately derived

for patients with GS<7, GS=7 and GS>7. For current

external validation, data of 352 ≥pT2, pN0, hormone-naïve

patients treated with conventionally fractionated

adjuvant (175) or salvage (177) intent after radical

prostatectomy were available from two Institutions not

previously involved in the training data set analysis. The

predicted risk of 5-year bRFS was calculated for each

patient, taking into account the slope and off-set of the

model, as derived from the original calibration plot. Five-

year bRFS data were compared against the predicted

values in terms of overall performance, calibration and

discriminative power.

Results

The median follow-up time, pre-RT PSA and D were 83

months (range: 36-216 months), 0.28 ng/mL (0.01-9.01

ng/mL) and 70.2Gy (66–80Gy); the GS distribution was:

GS<7: 118; GS=7: 185; GS>7: 49. The performances of the

model were excellent: the calibration plot showed a

satisfactory agreement between predicted and observed

rates (slope: 1.02; R

2

=0.62, Figure 1). A moderately high

discriminative power (AUC=0.68, 95%CI:0.62-0.73) was

found, comparable to the AUC for the original data set

(0.69, 95%CI:0.66-0.73). The predicted 5-year bRFS for the

whole population assessed as the weighted average of the

values referred to the three groups (i.e.: GS<7, =7, >7)

was 67%, compared to an observed 5-year bRFS equal to

68% ± 5% (95%CI). The agreement was slightly worse in the

GS<7 group (70% vs 79% ± 7%) compared to GS=7 (66% vs

66% ± 7%) and GS>7 (62% vs 51% ± 14%).

Conclusion

A comprehensive, radiobiologically consistent Poisson-

based TCP model of the response to post-prostatectomy

RT was validated for the first time on a completely

independent data set. A more extensive validation on a

larger population is actually in progress to further

corroborate its generalizability.

PO-0853 A method for automatic selection of

parameters in NTCP modelling

D. Christophides

1

, A.L. Appelt

2

, J. Lilley

3

, D. Sebag-

Montefiore

2

1

Leeds CRUK Centre and Leeds Institute of Cancer and

Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

2

Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology - University of

Leeds and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University

Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom

3

Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital,

Leeds, United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

The use of multivariate models in predicting NTCP has the

potential of improving predictive accuracy compared to

univariate models

1

. However the large numbers of clinical

parameters and dose metrics involved can make the

selection of the optimal multivariate model inconsistent

and time consuming.

In this study a genetic algorithm based method is utilised

to automatically generate ordinal logistic regression

models; subsequently the quality of the parameter

selection process is evaluated by comparison with

published results on the same patient cohort

2

.

Material and Methods

A general method for selecting optimal models for

outcome prediction in radiotherapy was developed

(Fig.1). The method was tested on data from 345 rectal

cancer patients, used in a previously published study

2

, to

generate ordinal logistic regression models for the

prediction of acute urinary toxicity during

chemoradiotherapy. Principal component analysis (PCA)

was used to derive principal components (PCs) that

summarise the variance in the DVH data. Overall 25

clinical parameters were considered in the analysis

including demographics, treatment regime, plan

parameters and stage of disease; as well as 8 PCs that

explained >95% of the variance in the DVHs.

Urinary toxicity was categorised as grade 0, 1 and 2≥

cystitis, according to the CTCAE v3.0. The method (Fig.1)

for optimising the models was implemented in Python and

the entire procedure was repeated 100 times, using

bootstrap sampling from the whole data set, to evaluate

the stability of the parameter selection.

Confidence intervals for the Akaike information criterion

(AIC) of the final models selected were estimated using