Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  476 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 476 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S461

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

PO-0856 Systematic baseline shifts of lymph node

targets between setup and treatment of lung cancer

patients

M.L. Schmidt

1

, L. Hoffmann

1

, M.M. Knap

2

, T.R.

Rasmussen

3

, B.H. Folkersen

3

, D.S. Møller

1

, B. Helbo

2

, P.R.

Poulsen

2

1

Aarhus University Hospital, Medical Physics, Aarhus C,

Denmark

2

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology,

Aarhus C, Denmark

3

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of

Pulmonology, Aarhus C, Denmark

Purpose or Objective

Internal target motion results in geometrical uncertainties

in lung cancer radiotherapy. The lymph node (LN) targets

in the mediastinum are difficult to visualize in cone-beam

computed tomography (CBCT) scans for image-guided

radiotherapy, but implanted fiducial markers enable

visualization on CBCT projections and fluoroscopic kV

images. In this study, we determined the intrafraction

motion of mediastinal LN targets in both the setup CBCT

and fluoroscopic kV images acquired during treatment

delivery, and investigated the baseline shifts and

treatment accuracy of LNs for ten lung cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Ten lung cancer patients had 2-4 fiducial markers

implanted in LN targets by EBUS bronchoscope. A total of

26 markers were evaluated. The patient received IMRT

with daily setup CBCT for online soft tissue match on the

primary tumor. During treatment delivery, 5 Hz

fluoroscopic kV images were acquired orthogonal to the

MV treatment beam. Offline, the marker positions were

segmented in each CBCT projection and fluoroscopic kV

image. From the segmented marker positions, the 3D

marker trajectories were estimated from the

segmentations with sample rate of 11 Hz during CBCT

acquisition and 5 Hz during treatment delivery.

The 3D motion amplitude and mean position of each LN

marker as well as the intrafraction baseline shifts between

setup CBCT and treatment delivery were calculated.

Results

Figure 1 shows the internal motion of one marker at one

fraction. The motion is shown relative to the mean

position during the CBCT scan and corrected for the couch

shift between CBCT and treatment. For this marker, the

baseline shift was 4.8 mm cranially, 0.6 mm posteriorly,

and 0.7 mm towards right. Figure 2a shows the distribution

of intrafraction baseline shifts for all patients and LNs at

all fractions. Systematic LN baseline shifts occurred

between CBCT and treatment delivery in the cranial

direction (mean 2.4 mm (SD 1.9 mm)) and posterior

direction (0.8 mm (1.1 mm)). The frequency of cranial

baseline shifts exceeding 4 mm and 6 mm were 15 % and 4

%. The baseline shifts resulted in systematic mean

geometrical errors during treatment delivery of 2.8 mm

(cranial) and 1.4 mm (posterior)(Figure 2b) for the LNs.

These errors were substantially larger than the sub-

millimeter mean errors expected from the setup CBCT

based soft tissue tumor match when correcting for the

applied couch shifts.

In general, the largest LN motion amplitude was observed

in the cranio-caudal direction both during CBCT and

treatment delivery. The mean motion amplitudes during

CBCT and treatment delivery agreed within 0.2 mm in all

three directions.

Conclusion

Systematic cranial and posterior intrafraction baseline

shifts between setup CBCT and treatment delivery

occurred for mediastinal LN targets in lung cancer patients

and reduced the treatment accuracy. Intrafraction motion

amplitudes were stable throughout each treatment

fraction, as well as the treatment course.

PO-0857 Analysis of Intrafraction Motion in Image-

Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Spinal metastases

J.G. Svestad

1

1

Oslo University Hospital The Norwegian Radium

Hospital, Department of Medical Physics, Oslo, Norway

Purpose or Objective

Stereotactic radiosurgery of spinal metastases include

tight margins and steep dose gradients to the surrounding

organs at risk (OAR). The proximity of the target to the

adjacent spinal cord and the aim of keeping the dose to

the spinal cord within tolerance require a high degree of

precision in dose delivery. This study aimed to evaluate

intrafractional motion using cone beam computed

tomography (CBCT) image guidance, for immobilized

spinal stereotactic radiosurgery patients, with correction

in all six degrees of freedom.

Material and Methods

Intrafractional motion during spine radiosurgery

treatment in 16 patients (26 fractions) was retrospectively

analyzed. All patients were immobilized in the BlueBAG

BodyFIX (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweeden) that uses a vacuum

pump to create a precise mold of the patient’s position.

Radiation treatment was performed using a Varian

Truebeam STx linear accelerator equipped with a

PerfectPitch 6 degrees of freedom couch (Varian Medical

Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, USA).

Following initial setup, a CBCT was acquired for patient

alignment and patient position was corrected in all six

degrees of freedom. Patients were resetup manually, and

the process was reinitiated if the ± 3˚ rotational couch

tolerance was exceeded. A post treatment CBCT was