Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  514 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 514 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S499

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

To note that, except for output constancy, the differences

in ranking order in the first positions are due to the

treatment techniques implemented on the two linacs:

VMAT for Unique, requiring accurate tests on dose

modulation and multi leaf collimator speed; treatment

with multiple isocenters and/or junctions between

adjacent fields for DBX, requiring accurate tests on couch

and jaw position indicators.

Conclusion

FMEA is a useful tool to optimize and prioritize the linac

QCs. It allowed to identify the more relevant tests for

patient safety by taking into account the specific

equipment, treatment modalities and clinical practice.

The variability and subjectivity of the FMEA scoring,

mostly caused by individual differences in risk perception

and professional experience of the involved physicists, can

be limited by a semi-quantitative analysis of each failure

mode and of the QC trend.

PO-0909 QA test of MLC speed using a fluorescent

screen-CCD based dosimetry system

B. Yang

1

, T.L. Chiu

1

, C.W. Cheung

1

, H. Geng

1

, W.W.

Lam

1

, K.Y. Cheung

1

, S.K. Yu

1

1

Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Medical Physics and

Research Department, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR

China

Purpose or Objective

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate quality

assurance (QA) test on the speed accuracy of multileaf

collimator (MLC) which is crucial for intensity modulated

radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) modality, using a

fluorescent screen-CCD based dosimetry system.

Material and Methods

Our fluorescent screen-CCD based dosimetry system

consisted of a fluorescent screen sandwiched by two

transparent PMMA blocks and a low dark noise CCD

camera. The fluorescent screen was aligned

perpendicularly to the radiation beam line and the

fluorescent light was directed to the CCD camera by a 45º

mirror underneath. All components were assembled in an

L-shape light-tight box. The median filter was applied to

remove the radiation induced spike noise. Test delivery

plans with fixed 1cm MLC gap and constant movement

speed for both carriage A and B sliding from one side to

another were created for QA of MLC speed. During the

delivery of these plans, the CCD camera captured the

images continuously with a fixed exposure time 0.1s at its

maximum frame per second (fps) under different settings

of pixel binning. The maximum fps of our current system

is limited to 0.98, 1.61 and 3.11 under 1×1, 2×2 and 4×4

pixel binning setting which corresponds to a spatial

resolution of 0.259, 0.518 and 1.036 mm/pixel

respectively. By tracking the movement of the edge of

leaves, the speed could be calculated. Further the

machine trajectory log files were also analyzed for

comparison and t-test was performed to evaluate the

statistical significance between our measured speeds and

those calculated from log file.

Results

The calculated speed of leaf #30 for both carriage A and B

is listed in Table 1. By analyzing the machine log file, the

speed of the same leaf was calculated to be 25.00±0.10,

15.05±0.12 and 4.99±0.12mm/s for carriage B;

25.00±0.12, 15.05±0.11 and 4.99±0.13mm/s for carriage A

under nominal speed 25, 15 and 5mm/s respectively. Our

measured MLC speed for 1×1 pixel binning setting and that

extracted from log data are also plotted in figure 1. T-test

results show that the p values are all larger than 0.3,

which suggest the measured results are not statistically

distinguishable from log data and our measurement is

accurate compared with log data. Similar results were also

obtained for other leaves.

Conclusion

The fluorescent screen-CCD based dosimetry system can

serve as an independent and reliable tool for QA of MLC

speed, whose temporal resolution as a motion monitor can

be further improved by using the camera with higher fps.

PO-0910 Is Linac-Based Total Body Irradiation (TBI) on

the coach by VMAT Feasable?

B. Tas

1

, I.F. Durmus

1

, A. Okumus

1

, O.E. Uzel

1

1

Yeni Yuzyil University Gaziosmanpasa Hospital,

Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

Purpose or Objective

In our study, we investigate the use of Linac-Based TBI by

VMAT tecnique at nominal SAD on the coach. Eight TBI

patient’s treatment planning were performed using

Monaco5.1

®

treatment planning system with dual arc

VMAT tecniques for each patient.

Material and Methods

For treating patients, Versa HD

®

(Crawley, Elekta) linear

accelerator with 6 MV, equipped with Agility

®

collimator

system, XVI 5.0 cone beam CT was used as a Image Guided

Radiation Therapy (IGRT) method for VMAT delivery.