Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  527 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 527 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S512

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

Five-year clinical outcome of MR-guided HDR-BT boost is

encouraging, providing excellent disease control and lack

of serious late side effects. A slight decline in long-term

urinary QoL was observed.

PO-0932 Prostate-specific Antigen bounce in patients

treated with 125I prostate brachytherapy: Keep calm

A. Pires

1

, D. Moreira

1

, C. Castro

1

, A. Oliveira

1

, J.

Oliveira

2

, L. Trigo

3

1

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco

Gentil- EPE, Radioncology, Porto, Portugal

2

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco

Gentil- EPE, Urology, Porto, Portugal

3

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco

Gentil- EPE, Brachytherapy, Porto, Portugal

Purpose or Objective

Permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) with

125

I is

an established curative modality for the treatment of

localized prostate cancer. After treatment, prostate-

specific antigen (PSA) level may fluctuate and temporarily

increase without a clear reason. This phenomenon is

called “PSA bounce” (PSAb) and often causes anxiety in

patient and physician. Our aim was to analyse the kinetics

of PSA in our patients and the association between PSA

bounce and the long term disease outcome after prostate

BT with

125

I.

Material and Methods

We analysed 134 patients treated with

125

I implantation

monotherapy between 2004 and 2006 in a single

institution. All patients had tumour stage T1-T2cN0M0,

Gleason score ≤ 7 and follow-up time was ≥ 9 years.

Patients who received neo-adjuvant hormone

therapy were excluded. PSAb was defined as a rise

beyound 0.2 ng/ml the initial PSA nadir with a subsequent

decline to or below the initial nadir without treatment.

Biochemical failure (BF) was determined using the Phoenix

definition (nadir +2 ng/mL). Associations between PSAb

and the various pre and post-treatment factors were

assessed with logistic regression analysis, the association

between a PSAb and BF was examined with the

log-rank

test and the

Mann-Whitney U

test was applied to test for

difference in the time to a PSA rise between PSAb and BF

patients.

Results

PSAb occurred in 53 (39,8%) patients with a median time

to bounce of 18,8 months. Only 7 (13,2%) patients with

PSAb developed BF, in contrast to 12 (15%) patients

without previous bounce (p = 0,084). Among the pre and

post-treatment factors, only younger age predicted a PSAb

on a multivariate analysis (p = 0.049). PSA levels during

the bounce reached levels as high as 8,85 ng/mL in this

cohort. BF occurred in 19 patients (14,4%). The 9-year

overall survival rate was 83,6%, the 9-year disease-specific

survival was 95,8% and the rate of survival at 9-year

freedom from BF was higher than 90%.

Conclusion

PSAb is a common finding in our population and is

associated with a lower rate of subsequent BF. Patients

should be advised for the eventual PSAb after

permanent

125

I prostate BT. Those who experience a PSAb

are more likely to be younger. The physicians involved in

patients follow-up after prostate BT should also be aware

of this phenomenon, encouraging them to adhere to

appropriate PSA surveillance and avoiding unnecessary

and repetitive PSA measurements, biopsies and premature

or inappropriate initiation of salvage therapy during PSAb.

Poster: Brachytherapy: Gynaecolgy

PO-0933 Urethral dose in cervical image guided

brachytherapy

K. MacLennan

1

, M. Zahra

2

, W. Keough

2

1

NHS Lothian, ST6, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

2

NHS Lothian, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh,

United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

Urethral dose is not currently included in the

recommendations for the dose constraints for organs at

risk (OARs). However, combined external beam and HDR

cervical brachytherapy can result in significant urinary

toxicity. We investigated the urethral dosimetry for

patients treated with HDR brachytherapy.

Material and Methods

Retrospective audit of 117 patients undergoing cervical

brachytherapy for cervical cancer in the Edinburgh Cancer

Centre between 2010-2015. Patients were treated with

45Gy/25 fractions EBRT followed by 3 fractions of CT-

guided HDR brachytherapy with a ring and tandem aiming

for D90 between 80-85Gy. The urethra and peri-urethral

tissues were retrospectively contoured 1cm inferiorly from

bladder neck or to the axial slice corresponding to the

metal connector of ring and tandem device (whichever

most inferior). Dose volume histograms were used to

determine the urethral D2cc and expressed as 2Gy

equivalent (EQD2) using an a/b ratio of 3. A combined

EQD2 dose for external beam and HDR treatment was

calculated. Data was also collected on the length and

angle of the tandem applicator and a paired T-test with

0.05 significance level was used to assess the effect of the

angle or tandem length on the urethral dose.

Results

117 patients aged 21-84. A 30º applicator angle was used

in 12% cases, 45º in 67%, 60º in 21% patients. A 6 cm

applicator was used in 68% patients; 4cm in 32% patients.7

patients had a single fraction of HDR brachytherapy and

converted to a CT planned phase 2 with external beam

radiotherapy. Excluding the phase 2 patients, median

combined dose to HRCTV was 84.03 Gy and to the urethral

d2cc was 50.7Gy (range: 44.8- 173.9Gy)

Comparing the maximum EQD2 to 2cm

3

urethra from the

fractionated treatment by applicator angle and length;

Tandem

Applicator

Angle

30º Tandem

45º Tandem

60º Tandem

Maximum

EQD2 per

fraction to

2cm

3

urethra

Median 1.52 Gy

(range 0.94-4.90)

Median 3.63 Gy

(range 0.70-

60.98)

Median

3.262 Gy

(range 0.76-

23.67)

Total EQD2

2cm

3

urethra 3

fractions HDR

BT

Median 3.59 Gy

(range 1.59-12.30)

Median 8.07 Gy

(range 1.82-

130.75)

Median 6.89

Gy

(range 2.14-

52.81)

T test for angle (30º vs 45º, 45º vs 60º and 60º vs 45º)

suggested a difference in urethral dose using a

30º applicator, with a tendency for lower urethral D2cc

with a 30º angle. (30 vs 45 p = 0.002 and 30 vs 60 p =

0.04).

There was no difference in urethral dose per HDR

fraction according to applicator length (t-test, p = 0.54).

Conclusion