Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  533 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 533 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S518

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Cardenal Carro

2

, J.T. Anchuelo Latorre

2

, M. Ferri Molina

2

,

A. Kannemann

2

, D. Guirado

3

, P.J. Prada

2

1

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla,

Radiophysics, Santander, Spain

2

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Radiation

Oncology, Santander, Spain

3

Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Radiophysics,

Granada, Spain

Purpose or Objective

In vivo dosimetry (IVD) applied to HDR BT treatments

allows to monitor real dose delivered to clinically relevant

areas. MOSFET detectors are the most suitable devices for

this task because of their tiny dimensions, which enables

their introduction into identical needles to those used in

treatments. However, these type of detectors show

responses depending on source-to-detector angle and

distance. Mathematical models describing these

dependences can be obtained from a correct detector

characterization. Applying these models on the

measurements should minimize the impact of those

dependences, improving precision and accuracy. The

purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical data of IVD

applied to HDR prostate BT using MOSFET TN-502RDM from

Best Medical Canada with the Ir-192 Vr2 source contained

in Flexitron aferloader (Nucletron-Elekta) and

mathematical models describing those dependences

obtained in a previous characterization work.

Material and Methods

Clinical data were taken from five patients suffering from

prostate cancer. One to three measuring points were

taken for each patient, where the MOSFET were

positioned. Anatomical areas measured were

neurovascular bundles, bulbourethral area and

periurethral area. Nine measuring points were taken and

evaluated.

Real time ultrasound image guided technique was used to

implant the treatment needles. An additional needle was

needed for each measuring point. Oncentra Prostate

4.2.2.4. was used to calculate the treatment planning

following a standard procedure. Subsequently,

coordinates of measuring points and dwell positions were

taken as well as dose contribution of each dwell position

to each measuring point.

After irradiation, mathematical models were applied on

measured dose. Table 1 shows the three models

considered, their parameters and the goodness of fit. TPS

dose, direct MOSFET measured dose and calculated dose

after applying the mathematical models on direct MOSFET

dose were evaluated.

Results

Figure 1 shows the results normalized to TPS d ose. All

measurements suffer an approach to TP S dose after

applying the mathematical models. The ave rage value of

percentage difference between TPS dose and direct

measured dose was 15% while the average percentage

difference after applying the mathematical models

decreases to 9% without any point exceeding 20%.

Estimated global uncertainty associated to these

corrected measurements were into the range 3.7-4.3%.

Conclusion

The application of mathematical models describing the

significant dependences of MOSFET TN-502RDM on their

measurements results in an accuracy increase besides an

improvement in precision. However, IVD implementation

in HDR prostate BT treatments as a possibility of real-time

decision making related to an error detection needs a

retrospective evaluation of a larger sample data to define

correctly these error detection thresholds.

PO-0944 Dosimetric influence produced by the

presence of an air gap between the skin and the

freiburg flap

M. Fernandez Montes

1

, S. Ruíz Arrebola

1

, R. Fabregat

orrás

1

, E. Rodríguez Serafín

1

, J.A. Vázquez Rodríguez

1

,

M.T. Pacheco Baldor

1

, N. Ferreiros Vázquez

1

, M.A.

Mendiguren Santiago

1

, J.I. Raba Díez

1

, M.M. Fernández

Macho

1

, J.T. Anchuelo Latorre

2

, M. Ferri Molina

2

, A.

García Blanco

2

, I. Díaz de Cerio

2

, M.A. Cobo Belmonte

2

,

A. Kannemann

2

, J. Andreescu Yagüe

2

, M. Arangüena

Peñacoba

2

, N. Sierrasesumaga Martín

2

, D. Guirado

llorente

3

, I. Bernat Piña

4

, P.J. Prada Gómez

2

1

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla,

RADIOPHYSICS, Santander, Spain

2

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Radiation

ONCOLOGY, Santander, Spain

3

Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Radiophysics,

Granada, Spain

4

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Medical

Oncology, Santander, Spain

Purpose or Objective

Surface applicators were proposed as a way to treat

superficial lesions with HDR brachytherapy. The Freiburg

Flap (FF) is an applicator used in this type of treatment

that has limited flexibility, so that in certain situations it

is not perfectly adapted to the surface treatment. The

purpose of this study is to quantify the discrepancy in the

TPS dose calculation produced by unsuitable positioning of

the applicator, as opposed to the ideal situation, when the

applicator is perfectly adapted to the patient's skin leaving

no air gap.

Material and Methods

Nucletron FF, is an applicator comprising of silicone

spheres attached to each other, 1 cm in diameter,

arranged in parallel rows, capable of adapting to the

surface to be treated.

The TPS Brachy Nucletron Oncentra (Elekta, v-4.5.2) was

used for dose calculation using an

192

Ir radiation source and

radiochromic film (Gafchromic EBT3) have been used for

dose measures which were subsequently analyzed with

ImageJ

To quantify the discrepancy between the TPS dose

calculation and the real administrated dose when

adaptation to the surface is not suitable, the experimental

setup designed shown in figure 1 was made, where we can