Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  535 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 535 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S520

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Material and Methods

The kinetic M

1

model, is based on the spherical harmonic

expansion of the distribution function, solution of the

linear Boltzmann equation. The first two angular moments

equations, combined with the Continuous Slowing Down

Approximation, are closed using the Boltzmann's principle

of entropy maximization. The algorithm computes at the

same time all primary and secondary particles created by

the interactions of the beam with the medium. Thanks to

the implementation of the interaction cross sections for

electrons and photons in the energy range from 1keV up

to 100 MeV, the algorithm can simulate different

treatment techniques such as the external radiotherapy,

brachytherapy or intra-operative radiation therapy.

As a first validation step, a large number of heterogeneity

shapes has been defined for various complex numerical

phantoms both for electron and photon monoenergetic

sources. Dose profiles at different positions have been

measured in water phantoms including inhomogeneity of

bone ( ρ = 1.85 g/cm

3

), lung ( ρ = 0.3 g/cm

3

) and air ( ρ =

10

-3

g/cm

3

). Secondly, taking as reference the Carleton

Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics Database, different

radioactive seeds have been implemented in the code.

Moreover, several simulations based on CT scan of

prostate cancer have been performed. The M

1

model is

validated with a comparison with a standard, accurate but

time consuming, statistical simulation tools as PENELOPE.

Results

The M1 code is capable of calculating 3D dose distribution

with 1mm

3

voxels without statistical uncertainties in few

seconds instead of several minutes as PENELOPE. Thanks

to its capability to take into account the presence of

inhomogeneities and strong density gradients, the dose

distributions significantly differ from those calculated

with the TG-43 approximations. More in detail: inter-seed

attenuation is treated, the real chemical composition of

the different tissues can be taken into account and the

effects of patient dimensions are considered.

Conclusion

In the comparison with the MC results the excellent

accuracy of the M

1

model is demonstrated. In general, M

1

,

as the MC codes, overcomes the approximations that are

formalised in TG-43 in order to decrease the complexity

of the calculations. Thanks to its reduced computational

time and its accuracy M

1

is a promising candidate to

become a real-time decision support tool for

brachytherapists.

PO-0947 Image-guided brachytherapy with 106Ru eye

plaques for uveal melanomas using post implantation

MRI

G. Heilemann

1

, N. Nesvacil

2

, M. Blaickner

3

, L. Fetty

1

, R.

Dunavoelgyi

4

, D. Georg

2

1

Medical University of Vienna/ AKH Vienna, Department

for Radiotherapy, Vienna, Austria

2

Medical University of Vienna/ AKH Vienna, Department

for Radiotherapy/ Christian Doppler Laboratory for

Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology,

Vienna, Austria

3

Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Health and

Environment Department Biomedical Systems, Vienna,

Austria

4

Medical University of Vienna/ AKH Vienna, Department

for Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria

Purpose or Objective

In radiation oncology magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) is

an important modality for tissue characterization, target

delineation and allows image-guidance due to its high soft

tissue contrast as a tool for better cancer treatment. In

106

Ru-brachytherapy of uveal melanomas MRI is mainly

used for pre-treatment planning scans to assess tumor size

and location. However, post-implantation MR scans yield

additional information on the plaque position in relation

to the target volume and critical structures. Together with

funduscopic images MRI can be used to better assess the

delivered doses to the target and the organs-at-risk (OAR).

The main goal of this feasibility study is to demonstrate

that fundus mapping and post implantation MR imaging

can be incorporated into the treatment planning workflow

of

106

Ru plaque brachytherapy.

Material and Methods

Patients were scanned in a 0.35 T MR scanner (Magnetom

C! Siemens, Germany) after

106

Ru eye plaque implantation.

To achieve a good normal tissue contrast for tumor

delineation and organ-at-risk (OAR) segmentation a fast

low angle shot (FLASH) T1 weighted sequence was utilized

(TR = 15 ms, flip-angles = 25°). A second FLASH MRI scan

with lower repetition times (TR = 11.2 ms) and flip-angles

(20°) was applied in order to display the plaque as a well-

defined void with minimal distortion artifacts at the cost

of lower signal to noise ratio and less soft tissue contrast.

Based on the MRI the resizable 3D eye model of a newly

developed treatment planning software (described in

detail in [1]) was adapted to the individual patient

anatomy in terms of size and plaque position.

Furthermore, the funduscopy image was projected onto

the retina of the digital 3D eye model.

Results

The presented method using two MR sequences yielded 3D

image sets that allowed segmenting both the anatomical

structures and the 106-Ru plaque. The funduscopy image

on the other hand is the optimal modality for tumor

segmentation. By combination the 3D eye model can be

adapted to match the individual patient and thus allow for

individual treatment planning and dose calculation (based

on MR anatomy) where the post-implantation imaging

accounts for the actual position of the plaque with respect

to the target and critical structures. This way irradiation

times can be calculated which guarantee full tumor

coverage. Moreover, the workflow can be applied for

treatment plan optimization strategies where plaques are

shifted in order to reduce doses to OARs.

Conclusion

In this feasibility study it was shown that MRI in

combination with funduscopy can be used to optimize

brachytherapy with

106

Ru plaques. The additional spatial

information on plaque position relative to critical

structures, tumor geometry as well as position can be used

for more precise dose calculations and therefore improved

treatment planning.

References:

[1] G. Heilemann et al. Treatment plan optimization and

robustness of

106

Ru eye plaque brachytherapy using a novel

software tool. Radiotherapy and Oncology. (in revision)

Poster: Brachytherapy: Miscellaneous

PO-0948 Role of HDR Intraluminal Brachytherapy in

carcinoma Esophagus: An institutional experience.

P.B. Kainthaje

1

, P. Gaur

1

, A. Malavat

1

, R. Paliwal

1

, V.

Sehra

1

1

Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Department of

Radiotherapy, Jodhpur, India

Purpose or Objective

To study the profile of patients of Carcinoma Esophagus

treated with Intraluminal Brachytherapy (ILBT), the

outcome of the treatment in terms of response

assessment, toxicity and survival.

Material and Methods

The study period was between January 2014 and June

2015, with 25 patients of carcinoma esophagus middle

third, treated with ILBT either as part of definitive

Radiotherapy or as part of palliative Radiotherapy. The

patients with unifocal disease ≤10cm in length and with no

recorded intra-abdominal or distant metastases received

definitive Radiotherapy with 44Gy/22Fr through EBRT with