Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  561 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 561 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S546

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

used for radiotherapy and to eliminate the errors caused

by curvature change.

Material and Methods

With the agreement of institutional review board, 71 head

and neck patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to

use different pillow for either primary or postoperative

RT. The three different pillows including conventional

pillow (CP, Silverman Headrests, CIVCO, medical

solution), customized pillow with alpha cradle (AC,

Smithers Medical Products, Inc. ), and Moldcare Head

Cushion pillow (MP, Alcar Co, Inc.). All patients used head

and shoulder mask for fixation. Daily on-board image (OBI)

was acquired for evaluation and correction of set-up error.

Change of curvature was measured by the movement of

the vertebral body of first (C1) and 5

th

(C5) cervical spine,

comparing to the location on digital reconstructed image

from CT simulation.

Results

Of all patients accrued, 34 patients received surgery and

postoperative radiotherapy, and 13, 11, and 10 patients

used CP, AC, and MP respectively. Thirty-seven patients

received primary radiotherapy without surgery, and 14,

11, and 12 of them used CP, AC, and MP respectively.

There were 1633 OBI acquired. In postoperative RT group,

the absolute movement of C1 were 0.07±0.03 cm,

0.07±0.03 cm, and 0.09±0.03 cm, when CP, AC, and MP

was used, respectively (p> 0.05). In RT group, the absolute

movements of C1 were 0.07±0.03 cm, 0.06±0.02 cm, and

0.08±0.08 cm, when CP, AC, and MP were used,

respectively (p> 0.05). In comparison the movement of C5,

the absolute movements were 0.15±0.04, 0.21±0.07, and

0.16±0.72, when CP, AC, and MP was used in postoperative

RT group, respectively (p> 0.05). In primary RT group, the

absolute movements were 0.23±0.09, 0.14±0.05, and

0.15±0.03, when CP, AC, and MP was used, respectively.

The movements of C5 in patients who used AC (p = 0.048)

or MP (p = 0.05) were significant lower than patients who

used CP in primary RT group.

Conclusion

Customized pillow could reduce setup error in patients

who received primary radiotherapy but not postoperative

radiotherapy.

PO-0999 Control of rectal volume with Kampo formula

during prostate radiotherapy: A prospective study

J. Kobayashi

1

, T. Tahara

2

, Y. Matsuzaki

1

, Y. Ono

1

, J.

Matsumoto

1

, H. Sato

1

, K. Onko

1

, Y. Kishimoto

1

, T.

Tanino

2

, H. Sakaguchi

2

, N. Uchida

2

1

Tottori University Hospital, Radiology, Yonago, Japan

2

Tottori University Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Yonago, Japan

Purpose or Objective

During intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for

prostate cancer, volume and position of the prostatic

gland, bladder and rectum should be kept stable to

minimize adverse events such as radiation proctitis or

rectal bleeding. For this purpose, keeping the rectal

volume small is essential. Daikenchuto (DKT) is a

traditional Japanese herbal (Kampo) formula used to treat

patients with abdominal bloating or constipation and is

reported to increase intestinal motility. DKT is composed

of three medical herbs (ginger, ginseng radix, Japanese

pepper) and maltose powder. The purpose of this study

was to investigate the effect of DKT on rectal volume

during prostate IMRT prospectively.

Material and Methods

The institutional review board approved this study and

written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

We divided consecutive 30 non-metastatic (cT1cN0 to

cT3bN0) prostate cancer patients into two groups. 15

patients were orally administered 15 grams of DKT per day

from one month before IMRT until the last day of the

treatment (DKT group). The remaining 15 were not

administered DKT (non-DKT group). The prescribed

radiation dose was 78 Gy in 39 fractions for 7.5 weeks to

the prostatic gland and proximal one-third or entire

seminal vesicle according to their stratified recurrence

risk. Kilo-voltage computed tomographic image (KV-CT) by

linear accelerator (Trilogy, Varian Co.) was taken for

three-dimensional matching set-up before each treatment

session. Each KV-CT was sent to a radiation treatment

planning workstation (Pinnacle 3, Phillips Medical Systems

Co.) and rectal volume of anal-sided 8cm length was then

measured. Calculated rectal volumes of the DKT group

were compared to those of the non-DKT group.

Administration of laxative agent, tubal gas suction or

colon irrigation was done depending on residual rectal

content before radiation.

Results

Total of 1,170 KV-CT were evaluated. Rectal volumes of

DKT and non-DKT groups were 48.79-63.46 (mean 54.69

+/- 4.00) cm

3

and 52.41-142.57 (mean 81.37 +/- 16.36)

cm

3

, respectively (p < 0.01). Adverse effects associated

with DKT use such as appetite loss, liver dysfunction or

interstitial pneumonia were not noted.

Conclusion

DKT appears to be useful in reducing rectal volume and

intra-fractional volume variance which would help prevent

radiation proctitis or rectal bleeding in prostate curative

radiotherapy. Longer follow-up with a larger patient

population is desired.

PO-1000 Immobilisation systems for brain treatment:

are individual head supports needed for stable fixation?

S. Meessen

1

, F. De Beer

1

, P. Van Haaren

1

, D. Schuring

1

1

Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

For stereotactic treatment of brain metastases, good

fixation of the patient is necessary to enable the use of

small PTV margins and reduce the volume of healthy brain

tissue receiving high doses. These fixations should prevent

significant intrafaction movement, and reduce the

interfraction rotations. The purpose of this study was to

compare three different fixation systems, two with

individual head supports and one with standard head

support, and to evaluate which of these systems was best

suited for stereotactic brain treatments.

Material and Methods

Patients receiving brain RT were treated with either one

of three different fixation systems (Orfit Industries, see

figure 1): a hybrid mask combined with (a) an individual

head support vacuum bag (n=20); (b) a Thermofit

individual head support(n=17); (c) a standard 3D head

support with cranial stop (n=10). All patients received a

correction protocol and were imaged at least 3 times

during the treatment course using an Elekta XVI CBCT,

both before and at the end of the treatment fraction. All

scans were registered on bony anatomy and translations

and rotations were recorded and analysed. For the three