Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  579 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 579 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S563

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

received 70 Gy /35 fractions /7 weeks

as per institutional protocol.

Results

Out of 54 patients only 46 patients (85%) completed NACT.

The most common side effect encountered during

induction chemotherapy is nausea and vomiting

representing 24%, followed by anorexia

representing 20%. After completion of induction

chemotherapy we had observed radiologically 24%, 63%

and 13% as complete, partial and non-responders

respectively. Acute toxicities like skin

reactions,mucosal reactions, xerostomia, pharyngitis/

hoarseness, upper GI side effects, and hematological

complications are more in Arm A than Arm B. Patients in

arm B has tolerated the local radiation

therapy compared to the patients in arm A. The quality

of life of patients in arm B compared to arm A was

appreciable during the local treatment. At 6

th

month

follow up local control, disease free

survival, overall survival, found in arm Avs arm B was 45%

vs 50%, 25% vs 35%, 85% vs 95% respectively. Progressive

disease and lost to follow up was 15% vs 10%, 10% vs 5%

respectively.

Patients died in arm A vs arm B was 5% vs 0% respectively.

Late radiation toxicities were assessed clinically at 6

months as per RTOG criteria and results had found not

statistically significant.

Conclusion

As observed in our study, 40 patients out of 54 has been

down staged. Symptoms like swallowing, anorexia, tumor

related pain, weight loss has been improved after

induction

chemotherapy.

However,

this

study definitely showed down staging and better

treatment tolerance towards IMRT arm in locally advanced

oropharyngeal carcinoma. A long term study for longer

follow up required for any statistically significant result.

Better response can be expected in early stage disease

EP-1028 MRI during radiotherapy: tumor geometry and

changes in organs at risk for head-and-neck patients

C. Grundmann

1

, K.A. Kessel

1,2

, S. Pigorsch

1

, S. Graf

3

, F.

Nüsslin

1

, S.E. Combs

1,2

1

Technische Universität München TUM, Department of

Radiation Oncology, München, Germany

2

Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute for Innovative

Radiotherapy iRT, Neuherberg, Germany

3

Technische Universität München TUM, Department of

Otorhinolaryngology, München, Germany

Purpose or Objective

The use of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) leads to a

protection of OARs and a resulting reduction of side

effects for the patient. The aim of this work is to make a

statement about the relevance of MRI during radiotherapy

(RT) and illustrate the importance for radiation oncology.

Material and Methods

In a retrospective analysis, for 17 patients with head-and-

neck-cancer, the volume of eight OARs relevant for

swallowing was examined on MRI. Contouring was

performed on MRI before, during and after radiation and

the dose applied to the OARs was determined. Five of the

17 patients additionally participated in a voice and

swallowing test on average 22.2 months after RT. Three

questionnaires (Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (ADI-D),

Voice Handicap Index, EORTC QLQ-H&N35) were used to

evaluate subjective voice and swallowing disorders and

the

related quality of

life.

Additionally, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of

swallowing (FEES) and a voice test were performed,

including the assessment of the patient’s phonation and

the severity of the vocal disorder after the Dysphonia