Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  896 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 896 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S880

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

observed on W2-CT. The degradations for D95 are 10.6%

and 11.8% for W2-CT and BS-W1-CT, respectively.

Similarly, the D90 degradations are 3.2% and 4%.

Conclusion

Our model was validated by comparing the WET and

dosimetric deviations between a simulated scenario and

the real data set. As a future work, we will use our model

to automatically generate uncertainty scenarios to feed a

TPS for robustness evaluation and optimization of proton

therapy plans. For instance, the new 4D robust optimizer

of the RayStation can easily consider multiple 4D-CT series

during the

optimization

process.

EP-1644 Deep inspiration breath hold respiratory

gated 3DRT for left breast cancer:Our clinical

experience.

M. Pinto Monedero

1

, M. Castanedo Álvarez

1

, J. Martínez

Ortega

1

, N. Gómez González

1

1

Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda,

Medical Physics, Madrid, Spain

Purpose or Objective

The purpose of this work is to describe Deep Inspiration

Breath Hold (DIBH) Respiratory Gated 3D Radiotherapy

Treatments (RT) in left breast cancer patients in our clinic

and to compare the results to free breathing (FB)

treatments.

Material and Methods

Patients were trained prior to simulation to evaluate

suitability for DIBH technique. Varian Real Time Position

Management (RPM) System (Varian Medical Systems, USA)

was used to monitor the patients’ respiratory motion.

They were asked to take a deep breath and hold it

repeatedly. A deep breath amplitude was set as a

reference level for the treatment sessions. For those

patients eligible to this technique, two CT scans were

acquired, under FB and DIBH conditions using a Toshiba

Aquilion LB CT (Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan).

Two treatment plans prescribed to 50 Gy in 25 fractions

were computed for each patient: one in FB and one in DIBH

conditions with XiO 5.02 treatment planning system

(Elekta AB, Sweden). Average dose and V20 for heart and

left lung as well as V95 for PTV were evaluated with the

physician to decide the treatment technique.

Patients were treated in a Varian Clinac-21 EX (Varian

Medical Systems, USA) with analogous Varian RPM System.

Patient position was verified through AP and lateral planar

images in DIBH conditions. The same amplitude which was

set as reference level at the simulation must be reached.

Results

25 patients underwent this procedure since the technique

was introduced at our clinic. Only one patient was found

not eligible. 20 of them were finally treated under DIBH

conditions, whereas 5 of them were treated in free

breathing conditions. Table I summarize average V20 for

heart and left lung as well as V95 for PTV. A significant

heart dose sparing was achieved in every patient, as V20

was reduced by 77.4%. Moreover, the left lung benefits of

a 24% reduction in V20.

Table I: Main Dose volume histogram results: average PTV

V95, V20 Left Lung, V20 Heart.

V95 PTV V20 Left Lung V20 Heart

DIBH 90,0% 21,65%

2,98%

FB 89,0% 28,47%

13,17%

Figure1: Axial and coronal CT slices of FB (on the left side)

and DIBH (on the right side) dose distributions for the same

patient.