S940
ESTRO 36 2017
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
a wide range of c-t-c distances (3-12 mm) were studied.
Peak and valley doses outside the target and the
minimum, maximum and mean doses inside the target
were scored. The objective of the planning was to obtain
a nearly homogeneous target dose in combination with low
peak doses in normal tissue as well as high peak-to-valley
dose ratios (PVDRs) close to the target.
Results
The most appropriate c-t-c distances, according to our
planning objectives, for 1, 2 and 3 mm beam-element
widths, were 7, 8 and 10 mm, respectively. With these c-
t-c distances, a very high entrance PVDR was obtained for
the 3 beam sizes (>10000). At 1 cm distance from the
target, the PVDR was 9, 10 and 14, for the three beam
widths studied. Inside the target, a high dose homogeneity
could be obtained for these cases (σ= ±4%). When
decreasing the c-t-c distance further, the PVDR decreased
dramatically outside of the target. With increasing c-t-c
distances, the PVDRs also increased as expected, but the
overall target dose homogeneity decreased due to the
appearances of cold spots.
Conclusion
In this work we studied the possibility to use beam-
element widths in the mm range for PGT combined with
crossfiring. For each proton beam-element size studied,
an optimal c-t-c distance was determined according to the
selected planning objectives. With the optimal parameter
setting, a high target dose homogeneity could be obtained
together with high PVDRs outside of the target.
EP-1734 AAPM TG-119 benchmarking of a novel
jawless dual level MLC collimation system
D. Mihailidis
1
, R. Schuermann
1
, C. Kennedy
1
, J. Metz
1
1
University of Pennsylvania, Radiation Oncology,
Philadelphia, USA
Purpose or Objective
To study delivery accuracy for fixed beam and volumetric
intensity modulated RT (IMRT & VMAT) of a new jawless
MLC collimation system mounted on a straight through
linac. The AAPM TG-119
1
recommended IMRT
commissioning process was used to benchmark the new
MLC system and compare it with the TrueBeam Millennium
(120-MLC). This new MLC has faster moving leaves that
may be more optimum for faster intensity modulated
deliveries.
Material and Methods
A prototype jawless MLC system with 28 pairs of 1cm
leaves provides a 28x28cm
2
field size at 100 cm. The
leaves have maximum over-travel, i.e. over 28 cm, and
100% inter-digitization. After acquiring beam data and
deducing the dosimetric leaf gaps (DLG) for modeling the
MLC in the planning system, we applied the test plans in
TG-119 IMRT for fixed IMRT and VMAT delivery. The same
test plans, using 6X-FFF (filter-free), were planned and
delivered, in an identical way, on a solid water phantom
with a cc-13 ion chamber (IC), a MapCheck2 (for IMRT),
and an ArcCHECK (for VMAT). Results obtained with the
millennium and the new MLC system were compared based
on γ-criteria of 3%/3mm-G (global normalization), and a
more stringent 2%/2mm-L (local normalization).
Results
The TB DLG values (1.3mm) were adjusted to balance the
confidence intervals for the IC measurements between
IMRT and VMAT. For the new MLC system, the DLG values
(0.1mm) were not adjusted. The TG-119 required IC
measurements resulted for prototype MLC: 1.19% (mean),
1.28% (SD), 3.71% (CL) and 0.19% (mean), 0.47% (SD),
1.11% (CL) for high dose and low dose regions,
respectively. For the TB MLC: 1.93% (mean), 0.5% (SD),
2.91% (CL) and 1.32% (mean), 1.17% (SD), 3.62% (CL) for
high dose and low dose regions, respectively. The
comparison of planned to delivered plans for all TG-119
targets for IMRT and VMAT deliveries are shown in Figures
1 and 2 below, and for the two MLC systems. The
prototype MLC system produced higher passing rates for
both IMRT and VMAT than the TB MLC system for the
various test plans. In addition, the prototype MLC system
performs equally well for IMRT and VMAT, whereas the TB
MLC is less optimum for VMAT delivery compared to IMRT
(Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
Conclusion
The TG-119 test plans were performed on a prototype MLC
system in comparison to the well-understood TB
Millennium MLC. Our investigation showed, in the context
of TG-119, this prototype MLC performs well for both IMRT
and VMAT plans.
1
Ezzel G., et al., 'IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution
planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM
Task Group 119.” Med. Phys.
36
:5359-5373 (2009).
EP-1735 Total skin irradiation with helical
Tomotherapy: Planning and dosimetry feasibility
aspects
A. Haraldsson
1
, P. Engström
1
1
Skåne University Hospital, Radiation physics, Lund,
Sweden
Purpose or Objective
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a lymhpatic disease that attacks
the skin. The primary treatment for treating MF is total
skin electron therapy (TSET). The procedure is technically
challenging both in terms of dosimetry and treatment
delivery. Helical TomoTherapy (HT) is due to its design
especially advantageous when irradiating very long and
complex targets. In this study we have explored the
possibility of employing HT in the treatment of total skin
irradiation (TSI).
Material and Methods
We used an anthropomorphic whole body phantom (PBU-
60 Kyoto Kaguka). The phantom was immobilized with
whole body vacuum bag, a five-point open head net mask
fixated to the couch and an individual neck rest. The
phantom was covered with a 7 mm thick wet suit made of
Neoprene (AquaLung) and CT scanned in two sets; from
vertex to thigh and from toes to hip. The CTV was defined
as skin with 5mm depth, with PTV as a 7 mm expansion.