Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  968 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 968 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S952

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 1: Transmission through a closed endplate in a

10x10cm^2 applicator for both materials.

There is higher transmission through the lead endplate

compared to the Cerrobend endplate for all energies but

even at the highest energy the difference is only 0.74%.

The measured PDDs agree with each other to within

1.2mm for all energies. The discrepancies were observed

near the surface of the PDD curves.

The output factors measured in solid water using the lead

inserts agreed with the commissioning values obtained

with the Cerrobend inserts to within ±1% apart from the

6e 10x6cm

2

applicator in which a 1.7% difference in output

factor was observed between the lead and Cerrobend. This

difference could be due to inaccuracies in the solid water

setup as the effective point of measurement of the NACP

was estimated to be 1mm.

The profiles measured agreed very well, with the largest

discrepancies occurring out of field for the higher energies

both crossplane and inplane. This is due to the higher

transmission through the lead cut-out at higher energies.

Conclusion

As there was very good agreement between the lead and

Cerrobend inserts and cut-outs for all the tests performed,

it can be concluded that using the lead cut-outs is

dosimetrically similar to the Cerrobend inserts with which

the eMC algorithm was configured.

EP-1754 Isocentric accuracy of Elekta VersaHD linear

accelerators

E. Kouwenhoven

1

, J. Van Egmond

1

, J. Van Wingerden

1

, M.

De Goede

1

, M. Mast

1

, J. Van Santvoort

1

1

Haaglanden Medical Centre Location Antoniushove,

Radiation therapy, The Hague, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

The demands on isocentric accuracy are high when

accelerators are used for stereotactic treatments. The

determination of the optical or mechanical isocenter is

inadequate for this purpose, and instead we aim for a

procedure to find the megavoltage isocenter. The radius

of the smallest sphere through which all rotation axes pass

when various collimator, gantry and table angles are

applied, is what we use as a measure to quantify the

isocentric accuracy. The purpose of the present study is to

(1) give an accurate measure of the size of the region

containing the megavoltage isocenter, and (2) establish

the distance between the rotation axes of table and

collimator, respectively. We developed a highly accurate

method to determine the isocentric accuracy of Elekta

VersaHD linear accelerators.

Material and Methods

The tests were performed on all 4 Elekta VersaHD

accelerators in our institute. We applied a modified

Winston-Lutz test, using a phantom containing a radio-

opaque ball, and imaged this phantom onto the EPID using

a 10 x 10 cm

2

field. Using the information of a considerable

region of the image, it was possible to find the geometry

(i.e., ball center and field outline) in much more detail

than just subpixel accuracy. Using a set of at least 8

images with various gantry and collimator angles we could

accurately obtain the isocentric accuracy per gantry

angle. A consecutive set of 16 images allowed for an

analysis giving the distance of the table rotation axis to

the collimator rotation axis. We were able to adjust the

table position slightly to obtain accuracies necessary for

stereotactic application.

Results

The method was tested, and we found an accuracy (1 SD)

of 0.01 mm. Four new Elekta accelerators (Versa HD) were

analyzed according the procedure. The main contribution

to isocentric inaccuracy for Elekta linacs is the gantry sag.

By adjusting the table rotation axis to a position between

the collimator rotation axes at gantry 0° and 180°,

isocentric accuracy can be optimized. The table presents

the results that were obtained.

Table: r

isoc

: the size of the isocenter quantified by the

radius of the sphere containing rotation axes when

applying several gantry angles at zero table angle. d

table-

coll

: the distance between rotation axis of the table and

the rotation axis of the collimator.

Linac

r

isoc

(mm)

d

table-coll

(mm)

A

0.68

0.20

B

0.53

0.14

C

0.77

0.06

6

0.38

0.01

Figure: an EPID image of a 10x10 cm

2

field and the ball

bearing. The field outline and the detected ball are

overlayed.

Conclusion

With our method it is possible to quickly obtain a measure

for isocentric accuracy. In combination with table rotation

we achieved accuracies better than 0.9 mm, after

adjusting the table.

EP-1755 Multi-modality end-to-end audit by the ACDS

J. Lye

1

, F. Gibbons

1

, M. Shaw

1

, A. Alves

1

, S. Keehan

1

, I.

Williams

1

1

Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety

Agency, Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service,

Melbourne- Victoria, Australia

Purpose or Objective

The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has

commissioned a custom phantom and audit incorporating

conformal, IMRT, VMAT, and FFF modalities. The design

covers future inclusion of small field and SABR modalities.

The vision of the ACDS is to provide a comprehensive suite

of audit modalities covering all common clinical practice,

ultimately to ensure patient safety and to improve

national dosimetry. The ACDS also aims to provide

dosimetric information that can be used domestically and

globally in the clinical trial setting

Material and Methods

To ensure efficient delivery of the audit service, all

modalities relevant to a facility’s clinical practice are

measured in a single audit visit. The incorporation of new

audit modalities requires a consideration of phantom

design suitable for multiple modalities and limitations on

facility and ACDS workload. Classification of new