Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  970 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 970 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S954

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

device (EPID) and make this process as fast and accurate

as possible.

Material and Methods

The LINAC is an Elekta Synergy with Agility MLC and 6 MV

photons. A software is developed in MATLAB with some

remarkable points:

1.

Elekta iCOMCAT software was employed to

generate and send the strip-test with multiple

segments as a unique treatment, as is much

faster than creating and irradiating a beam for

each segment. With the software of Elekta

iView is difficult to acquire a complete image

of each full segment as this is not fast enough,

so fluency corrections of these segments were

performed, in order to avoid erroneous pixel

values (PV) in the way: a) In a 23x23 open field

is acquired a horizontal profile and measure

the % PV (in the center position of each future

segment), this % is related to the PV of the

position of a reference segment. b) Measure

the mean PV in the center of each strip-test

segment, and obtain the % PV related to the

reference segment PV. c) Rescale the image of

each segment in order to obtain the % PV

(respect the reference segment). Finally make

the sum of all images.

2.

Segments of 2 x 20 cm (cross-plane x in-plane)

to form series of strip-test images with gaps

overlapping from 1.2 to 3 mm are acquired for

taking the MLC reference after calibration. The

strip-test need bigger gap spread than other

MLC in order to detect the gap position

correctly, because of the lower penumbra.

3.

To correct the collimator angle is used the

filtered back projection method, because is very

tricky to use the interleaf leakage, as this MLC

have much lower interleaf transmission than

other MLC, like Millenium (from Varian).

4.

To localize the radiation center (RC) of the EPID

is used a LINAC tray with centered radiopaque

mark. Four 20x20 fields are obtained with this

tray at 4 collimator angles. RC is determined for

gantry 0º detecting the mark position in each

image and obtaining the mean. A vector

displacement is created to obtain RC with one

image at 0º collimator. Tray images for various

gantry angles at 0º collimator are acquired, so

that with just one tray image is enough to detect

RC exactly. This method is faster than using

field edges, where at least 2 images at different

collimator angles must be acquired for each

gantry angle.

Measurements of leaf positions using light projection are

made. Also are obtained strip-test with films and analyzed

with

RIT

software.

Results

The differences in leaf positions compared with film and

light field are beyond 0.1 mm and 1 mm (light field edge

detection has a much bigger uncertainty). The acquisition

and analysis for one strip-test take less than 4 min.

Conclusion

The methodology employed analyzes a MLC strip-test in an

Elekta LINAC in a fast and accurate way.

EP-1758 Towards Clinical Implementation of an Online

Beam Monitoring System

M. Islam

1

, M. Farrokhkish

2

, Y. Wang

2

, B. Norrlinger

2

, R.

Heaton

1

, D. Jaffray

1

1

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of

Toronto, Medical Physics, Toronto, Canada

2

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Medical Physics,

Toronto, Canada

Purpose or Objective

Continual advancement of Radiation Therapy techniques

and consequent complexity in planning and delivery

require constant vigilance. To address this, the idea of

independent real-time beam monitoring has been

proposed. In this presentation, we describe initial steps

towards introducing the Integral Quality Monitoring (IQM)

system into clinical practice.

Material and Methods

The IQM system (manufactured by iRT, Germany) consists

of a large-area ion chamber mounted at Linear

Accelerator’s (Linac) accessory slot, which provides a

spatially dependent “dose -area- product” per field

segment. The system monitors beam delivery in real-time

by comparing the expected and measured signals.

Initial evaluation of the system included: reproducibility

and stability, agreements between calculated vs.

measured signals, sensitivity and specificity for errors. A

multiphase approach was considered for clinical

implementation. First, IQM data are collected during

conventional dosimetric QA tests. Results of the QA tests

with and without the IQM chamber in the beam are

compared. During this phase a reference dataset of

measured IQM signals vs. calculated is generated to help

determine the tolerance in the predicated

signals. Second, IQM system is introduced as the primary

pre-treatment QA tool. Gain in work-flow efficiency and