Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  102 / 140 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

Global Marketplace

www.read-tpt.com

100

September 2013

Steel

US Steel is among the petitioners

for a government investigation

into OCTG imports from nine

nations

A group of US makers of speciality steel pipe for oil and gas

drilling has launched one of the biggest trade cases in years,

asking the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to curb

what they claim is a flood of unfairly traded products from

nine countries. If the effort is successful, the price of some

high-margin steel products sold to the energy industry could

rise, benefiting United States Steel Corp and other domestic

producers.

The petition, filed 2 July on behalf of US Steel and eight other

companies, asked the commission to investigate imports

of some oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India, the

Philippines, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand,

Turkey, Ukraine and Vietnam.

In the opinion of Nomura Securities analyst Curt Woodworth,

the filing was a “modest positive” for US producers, but he

noted that domestic capacity is already set to rise in 2014 and

2015. “These trade cases can be time-consuming,” he told

Reuters (2 July). “With anti-dumping cases you need to prove

financial injury. That will be difficult, given that most of the

[petitioners] are still very profitable.” (“US Steel Pipe Makers

Defend Energy Business with Trade Case.” India edition, 3

July)

Cutting its profit estimates for US Steel on 3 July, the ratings

agency Standard & Poor’s also saw the ITC complaint as a

potential positive, although a final resolution would take some

time. In the short term, Mr Woodworth said, some countries

exporting to the US may dial back their aggressive pricing.

Even as US steel manufacturing suffers weaker demand,

steel pipe sales to the oil sector are a bright spot. In a sign

of how quickly demand for pipe has grown – driven by

shale rock exploitation facilitated by such horizontal drilling

techniques as hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) – the number of

horizontal drilling rigs tracked by Baker Hughes has risen 83

per cent since the start of 2010.

Spurred by this activity, imports of OCTG from the nine

countries cited in the petition have doubled in the past few

years to almost 1.8 million metric tons. They accounted for

about 63 per cent of the US market last year, according to the

American Iron and Steel Institute.

For its part, the American Institute for International Steel

(AIIS), the Washington, DC-based trade organisation

representing steel importers and exporters alike, called the

ITC filing “excessive and unwarranted” and warned that it

could disrupt oil and gas drilling.

According to David Phelps, the AIIS president, while the

low end of the market is over-supplied, this is not the case

for high-end seamless pipe sold by US Steel and others. He

said, “We think this” – the ITC petition – “is an overreach.”

In 2010, the US Commerce Department applied anti-

dumping duties ranging from about 30 to 99 per cent on

OCTG from China. The parties to the latest ITC petition are, in

addition to US Steel: Tenaris subsidiary Maverick Tube Corp;

Boomerang Tube; Energex Tube, a division of JMC Steel

Group; Northwest Pipe Co; Tejas Tubular Products; TMK

IPSCO; Vallourec Star; and LP Steel.

On the other hand . . .

“Buy America” rules require the federal government to

source domestically melted steel for use in transportation

infrastructure projects. But

American Metal Market

reported

(5 July) that, according to numerous sources in themarketplace,

“it appears that a handful of players may circumvent those

rules in an effort to improve their margins”.

“There are honest mills and there are dishonest mills, and

there’s no one doing anything to check and certify the mills,”

one industry source said of the alleged violations.

This source told AMM that the steel wire mill where he was

once employed was one such company: “[The mill] would

say it was this made-in-America melt chemistry. They would

submit made-in-America paperwork for foreign material.”