Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  383 / 634 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 383 / 634 Next Page
Page Background

introduction FY2014

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Capital decisions are typically of keen interest to citizens

because of their impact on community growth,

development, and tax rate. Citizen input can help to

assure that the most desirable projects receive highest

priority. Involving citizens in the process can gain support

for the capital plan and budget, and for funding options,

such as issuance of bonds where citizen approval is

required. Morrisville will utilize a survey tool to gather

citizen input on areas of focus every other year.

In addition, a public comment portal via the website will

be open for citizen comments and suggestions throughout

the CIP Process in conjunction with the Annual Budget

Process. Such forms of communication and input techniques

have the potential of reaching a wider audience within the

community lending valuable perspectives to the review. A

formal Public Hearing will be required and conducted in

conjunction with the Annual Operating Budget.

As in all community matters, the public is encouraged to

provide input by actively communicating their opinions on

service needs or key issues facing the community to their

representative Town Council via email, letters and phone

calls.

STAFF PARTICIPATION

A department needs survey will be conducted to identify,

document, and justify staff CIP requests. Departments will

provide scope, project cost estimates and revenue sources

(Finance/Budget will assist). Departments will use the CIP

Request Form to submit new projects to be considered.

This will include submissions of the Project Evaluation

Criteria Form. The forms will be updated every other

year.

FUNDING SOURCES

Typically, Morrisville plans capital projects using some

form of debt service instrument. The use of debt is

considered under the following circumstances:

1.

The capital item is a long-living asset with a useful

life greater than three years.

2.

The asset has a useful life expectancy that equals

or exceeds the length of the debt-financing period.

In many cases, a project may be financed through a

combination of several funding sources. Below are the

various funding sources typically used to finance and fund

CIP items:

General Fund

the capital item may require advanced

funding from the General Fund to begin design work.

The financing instrument reimburses funding provided

for by the General Fund prior to the close of the capital

project.

Grants

funding of the capital item was secured upon

application of a governmental grant ( e.g. CDBG, Law

Enforcement Grants, EPA Water Quality, Fire Safety

Grants, CAMPO, Wake County Park Grants) The capital

item is used for a public facility or equipment that is a

public good and that may or may not have a revenue

producing capability. (e.g. streets, municipal buildings,

structures, or parks). Typically, grant funds are

designed to be seed money and are a short-term

financing source.

Installment Purchase

the capital item is used for a

public facility or equipment that is a public good and

may or may not have revenue-producing capability.

These asset-backed loans involve an installment

purchase or financing agreement and perhaps a trust

indenture.

General Obligation Bonds

the capital item is used for a

public facility or equipment that is a public good and

that has no revenue producing capability (e.g. streets

and municipal buildings or structures). Generally, GO

Bonds are used for major projects. Growth in tax

based could be leveraged when a project is in response

to community demands.

Revenue Bonds

the capital item is used for a non-

public good in which a revenue stream is associated

with the capital item (e.g. airport, water, wastewater,

and electric systems capital items).

ACTIVATED PROJECTS

Once Staff and Council produce a final capital projects

prioritized list, it will be determined how many project(s)

might be activated (funded) across the 5YrCIP. This

consideration is evaluated in conjunction with the 5YrLRFM

projected financial capacity. If financial capacity does

not exist, the projects will remain in the prioritized list as

unfunded. This will occur once every other year. The

following is the current Project List showing funded and

unfunded projects.

CURRENT STATUS

Council entered into a CIP/Bond Referendum planning

cycle for the purpose of identifying what Capital

30